Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Driscoll Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
82
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Philanthropy$8.6MArts & Culture$1.7MEnvironment$1.5MEducation$1.1MHuman Services$549kHealth$428kReligion$82kCommunity Improvement$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k54 grants · $204k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $367k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $565k
$5,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION$100,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$100,000
FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER$65,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$50,000
ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL$50,000
DODGE NATURE CENTER$50,000
MULTICARE HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL$50,000
COMMUNITYGIVING$50,000
COMMUNITYGIVING$47,500
MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO$45,000
FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER$40,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$37,212
AVON HILLS FOLK SCHOOL$25,000
GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $266k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE INC: $2k → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE INC: $2k → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $2k → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE INC: $2k → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $2k → 8%THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $10k → 11%THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $10k → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $3k → 11%THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $10k → 11%FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $50k → 11%LELS POLICE BENEVOLENT FUND: $5k → 11%HEADWATERS RELIEF ORGANIZATION: $5k → 11%FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 11%FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 11%NATIVE GOVERNANCE CENTER: $10k → 11%NATIVE GOVERNANCE CENTER: $10k → 11%NATIVE GOVERNANCE CENTER: $5k → 11%NATIVE GOVERNANCE CENTER: $5k → 11%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA: $25k → 14%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA: $25k → 14%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA: $25k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THINK SMALL: $1k → 14%THINK SMALL: $1k → 14%THINK SMALL: $1k → 14%THINK SMALL: $1k → 14%THINK SMALL: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 60% of Driscoll Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 31% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 28% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Driscoll Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.4M · 92 repeat orgs$407k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

92 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
29

Total granted

$5.4M
$384k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

86%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $454k · revenue +50%
  • ML
    MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $405k · revenue +13%
  • MP
    MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $355k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF TACOMA - GREENTRIKE
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • WR
    WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +113%
  • EL
    EMPOWERED LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

3
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

4
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
5
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
10
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communitygiving and the most unlike its peers is The Cameron and Hayden Lord Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Local History MuseumsIndependent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…United Way AffiliatesCancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Public Library OperationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersImmigrant Worker SupportYouth Development ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Community FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Senior Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr12%5%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr14%22%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr20%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr21%3%10–20yr14%65%20–35yr16%8%35–55yr20%24%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/118
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/74,188

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/113
Grantees still filing
66/113
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $8,050,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+9 more — $483,650 · Philanthropy+9 moreMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $355,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA PU…MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $259,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA HI…Tacoma Art Museum — $215,000 · Arts & CultureTacoma Art M…The Arts Partnership — $100,000 · Arts & CultureThe Arts Par…MINNESOTA LAKES MARITIME SOCIETY — $75,413 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUM — $62,500 · Arts & CultureMinnesota Children's Museum — $55,000 · Arts & CultureAVON HILLS FOLK SCHOOL — $55,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC — $52,500 · Arts & Culture+14 more — $311,698 · Arts & Culture+14 moreTHOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER — $275,000 · OtherTHOMAS IRVIN…ANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS — $153,170 · OtherANNIE WRIGHT…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF TACOMA - GREENTRIKE — $75,000 · OtherST JOHN'S ABBEY WOODWORKING — $75,000 · OtherDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $75,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY — $69,625 · OtherThe Family Partnership — $100,000 · OtherThe Family P…INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA — $75,000 · OtherGREAT RIVER GREENING — $55,000 · Other+44 more — $619,408 · Other+44 moreMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION — $405,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER — $210,000 · EnvironmentWILDERNESS INQUIRY INC — $116,000 · EnvironmentMISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION — $110,000 · EnvironmentMINNESOTA LAND TRUST — $100,000 · EnvironmentWOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER — $50,000 · EnvironmentLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $48,420 · Environment+10 more — $93,692 · EnvironmentST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL — $453,958 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $50,000 · EducationCARLETON COLLEGE — $45,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $30,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Education+12 more — $165,500 · EducationNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $350,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $37,212 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $100,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES — $65,000 · HealthCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy — $50,000 · HealthCOURAGEOUS PARENTS NETWORKINC — $25,000 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FDN — $25,000 · HealthTHE CAMERON AND HAYDEN LORD FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Health+2 more — $10,608 · Health
Philanthropy$8,533,650Arts & Culture$1,541,111Other$1,572,203Environment$1,133,112Education$774,958Community Improvement$427,212Health$300,608

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $8,050,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL — $453,958 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION — $405,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $355,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $350,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHOMAS IRVINE DODGE NATURE CENTER — $275,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $259,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITYGIVING — $252,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTacoma Art Museum — $215,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER — $210,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS — $153,170 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWILDERNESS INQUIRY INC — $116,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMISSISSIPPI PARK CONNECTION — $110,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA LAND TRUST — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Arts Partnership — $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Family Partnership — $100,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMINNESOTA LAKES MARITIME SOCIETY — $75,413 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES — $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM — $62,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT RIVER GREENING — $55,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMinnesota Children's Museum — $55,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAVON HILLS FOLK SCHOOL — $55,000 over 4y, 10.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC — $52,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DENVER FOUNDATION — $51,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMINNESOTA MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $48,420 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE — $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMARGO FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetRUNESTONE MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetMinnesota Council on Foundations — $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAsia Pacific Cultural Center — $37,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $37,212 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILKWEED EDITIONS INC — $36,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMinnesota African American Hertiage Museum and Gallery — $34,500 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetWestern Resource Advocates — $32,990 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN LUIS VALLEY — $31,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $30,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE GOVERNANCE CENTER — $30,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN45.7× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Patrick and Aimee Butler Family · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mortenson Family Foundation · William Boss Foundation · Longview Foundation · Hrk Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Driscoll Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Bennington College Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Driscoll Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Driscoll Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph