Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dralla Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$177kHealth$78kHuman Services$27kYouth Development$12kArts & Culture$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,323
Median grant
6
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DASA$10,000
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB$7,500
HIGH FIVES FOUNDATION$7,323
CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION$5,043
COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES$3,500
SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,040
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROCHESTER ACCESSIBLE ADVENTURES: $6k → 14%SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES: $4k → 12%PARADOX SPORTS: $6k → 12%COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES: $3k → 12%PARADOX SPORTS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 12 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$199k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-18%
+24%

Still filing today

92%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Catalyst Sports Inc
    5× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +459%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    5× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +31%
  • SI
    STRIDE Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $27k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • PC
    PENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -20%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GREENSBORO PARKS RECREAT
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • RA
    Rochester Accessible Adventures
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Summit Adaptive Sports Inc

The organization's goal is to foster a healthy lifestyle through outdoor sports for individuals with disabilities in a fun, accessible, and inclusive environment.

Human Services
2
Colorado Discover Ability

Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.

Recreation & Sports
3
Adaptive Sports Partners of North Country Inc

To enrich the quality of life of people with disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
4
Accessible Alpine Adventure Tours
Health
5
North Carolina Adapted Sports Incorporated

North Carolina Adapted Sports provides adapted sports opportunities for people with a physical disability and advocates for access to an outdoor active lifestyle.

Recreation & Sports
6
Adaptive Surfers Academy

Surf competition training for Paralympic athletes

Recreation & Sports
7
Mount Snow Adaptive Sports Inc

Adaptive Sports at Mount Snow is a volunteer-driven non-profit that provides adaptive sports, recreational opportunities and educational experiences to the Mount Snow community and its visitors throughout the year. Adaptive Sports at Mount…

—
8
Oregon Adaptive Sports

Oregon adaptive sports exists to provide life-changing outdoor recreation experiences to individuals with physical and cognitive disabilities and concurrently to provide their families with the education and skills to enjoy these…

Recreation & Sports
9
Adaptive Sports Usa Inc

Our mission is to provide sport and recreational opportunities to persons with physical disabilities by promoting and facilitating outreach programs in communities throughout

—
10
Wintergreen Adaptive Sports

Outdoor sports instruction for people with disabilities

Recreation & Sports
11
Maine Adaptive Sports & Recreation

To promote year-round education and training for individuals with disabilies in order to develop skills, enhance independence, and provide enjoyment through active recreation.

Recreation & Sports
12
Accessportsamerica Inc

Increase function & fitness of children and adults with disabilities through sports and training.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adaptive Sports Program New Mexico Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
13/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catalyst Sports Inc: $49,500 · Recreation & SportsCatalyst Sports IncKinetic Kids Inc: $16,750 · Recreation & SportsKinetic Kids IncPENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTS: $9,900 · Recreation & SportsPENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTSORTHOTIC & PROSTHETIC ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsORTHOTIC & PROSTHETIC ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION …ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $7,425 · Recreation & SportsADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INCMESA ASSOCIATION OF SPORTS FOR THE DISABLED INC: $5,631 · Recreation & SportsWorld TEAM Sports: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsWORLD BASEBALL ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP RISE ABOVE INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $5,482 · Recreation & SportsSTRIDE Inc: $26,530 · OtherSTRIDE IncDASA: $15,000 · OtherDASAHIGH FIVES FOUNDATION: $7,323 · OtherHIGH FIVES FOUNDATIONMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC: $6,500 · OtherMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY…FRIENDS OF GREENSBORO PARKS RECREAT: $6,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF GREENSBORO PARKS RECR…BAY AREA OUTREACH RECREATION PROGRA: $4,750 · OtherBAY AREA OUTREACH RECREATION PRO…COACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLD FDN: $4,300 · OtherALL ABILITIES PRODUCTIONS NEW YORK: $4,100 · OtherOPAF AND THE FIRST CLINICS: $3,500 · OtherGateways Community Services Inc: $3,473 · Other+2 more: $4,250 · OtherRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $32,890 · HealthRehabilitation Institute o…JETT FOUNDATION INC: $16,211 · HealthJETT FOUNDATION INCGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $5,800 · HealthGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORT…CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $5,043 · HealthCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCI…GNOME INC: $4,800 · HealthGNOME INCEnhancing Skills for Life: $3,256 · HealthSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW ENGLAND: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $1,585 · HealthPARADOX SPORTS: $11,094 · Human ServicesPARADOX S…COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES: $6,000 · Human ServicesCOMMON GR…Rochester Accessible Adventures: $5,970 · Human ServicesRochester…SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,040 · Human ServicesSEED COMM…
Recreation & Sports$118,188Other$86,226Health$72,085Human Services$26,104

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCatalyst Sports Inc: $49,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $32,890 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIDE Inc: $26,530 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc: $16,750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJETT FOUNDATION INC: $16,211 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPARADOX SPORTS: $11,094 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTS: $9,900 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetORTHOTIC & PROSTHETIC ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $7,425 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES: $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRochester Accessible Adventures: $5,970 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $5,800 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMESA ASSOCIATION OF SPORTS FOR THE DISABLED INC: $5,631 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWorld TEAM Sports: $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $5,043 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD BASEBALL ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP RISE ABOVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGNOME INC: $4,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM NEW MEXICO INC: $3,700 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGateways Community Services Inc: $3,473 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEnhancing Skills for Life: $3,256 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,040 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW ENGLAND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLUKE5ADVENTURES: $1,782 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $1,585 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Move UnitedMD30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Move United · Christopher Reeve Foundation · The Hanger Charitable Foundation · Rei Cooperative Action Fund · Joy In Childhood Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dralla Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dralla Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Gnome Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dralla Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dralla Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dralla’s filings →

More from the funding graph