Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dralla Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$177kHealth$78kHuman Services$27kYouth Development$12kArts & Culture$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,323
Median grant
6
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DASA$10,000
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB$7,500
HIGH FIVES FOUNDATION$7,323
CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION$5,043
COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES$3,500
SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,040
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROCHESTER ACCESSIBLE ADVENTURES: $6k → 14%SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES: $4k → 12%PARADOX SPORTS: $6k → 12%COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES: $3k → 12%PARADOX SPORTS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$199k · 12 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$199k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-18%
+16%

Still filing today

92%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Catalyst Sports Inc
    5× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +459%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    5× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +31%
  • SI
    STRIDE Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $27k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • PC
    PENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -20%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GREENSBORO PARKS RECREAT
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • RA
    Rochester Accessible Adventures
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Summit Adaptive Sports Inc

The organization's goal is to foster a healthy lifestyle through outdoor sports for individuals with disabilities in a fun, accessible, and inclusive environment.

Human Services
2
Colorado Discover Ability

Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.

Recreation & Sports
3
Adaptive Sports Partners of North Country Inc

To enrich the quality of life of people with disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
4
Accessible Alpine Adventure Tours
Health
5
North Carolina Adapted Sports Incorporated

North Carolina Adapted Sports provides adapted sports opportunities for people with a physical disability and advocates for access to an outdoor active lifestyle.

Recreation & Sports
6
Adaptive Surfers Academy

Surf competition training for Paralympic athletes

Recreation & Sports
7
Mount Snow Adaptive Sports Inc

Adaptive Sports at Mount Snow is a volunteer-driven non-profit that provides adaptive sports, recreational opportunities and educational experiences to the Mount Snow community and its visitors throughout the year. Adaptive Sports at Mount…

8
Oregon Adaptive Sports

Oregon adaptive sports exists to provide life-changing outdoor recreation experiences to individuals with physical and cognitive disabilities and concurrently to provide their families with the education and skills to enjoy these…

Recreation & Sports
9
Adaptive Sports Usa Inc

Our mission is to provide sport and recreational opportunities to persons with physical disabilities by promoting and facilitating outreach programs in communities throughout

10
Wintergreen Adaptive Sports

Outdoor sports instruction for people with disabilities

Recreation & Sports
11
Maine Adaptive Sports & Recreation

To promote year-round education and training for individuals with disabilies in order to develop skills, enhance independence, and provide enjoyment through active recreation.

Recreation & Sports
12
Accessportsamerica Inc

Increase function & fitness of children and adults with disabilities through sports and training.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adaptive Sports Program New Mexico Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Community Health CentersChristian Youth Camps
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
12/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Catalyst Sports Inc — $49,500 · Recreation & SportsCatalyst Sports IncKinetic Kids Inc — $16,750 · Recreation & SportsKinetic Kids IncPENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTS — $9,900 · Recreation & SportsPENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTSORTHOTIC & PROSTHETIC ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · Recreation & SportsORTHOTIC & PROSTHETIC ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION …ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $7,425 · Recreation & SportsADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INCMESA ASSOCIATION OF SPORTS FOR THE DISABLED INC — $5,631 · Recreation & SportsWorld TEAM Sports — $5,500 · Recreation & SportsWORLD BASEBALL ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP RISE ABOVE INC — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $5,482 · Recreation & SportsSTRIDE Inc — $26,530 · OtherSTRIDE IncDASA — $15,000 · OtherDASAHIGH FIVES FOUNDATION — $7,323 · OtherHIGH FIVES FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF GREENSBORO PARKS RECREAT — $6,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF GREENSBORO PARKS RECR…MARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC — $6,500 · OtherMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY…BAY AREA OUTREACH RECREATION PROGRA — $4,750 · OtherBAY AREA OUTREACH RECREATION PRO…COACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLD FDN — $4,300 · OtherALL ABILITIES PRODUCTIONS NEW YORK — $4,100 · OtherOPAF AND THE FIRST CLINICS — $3,500 · OtherGateways Community Services Inc — $3,473 · Other+2 more — $4,250 · OtherRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $32,890 · HealthRehabilitation Institute o…JETT FOUNDATION INC — $16,211 · HealthJETT FOUNDATION INCGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION — $5,800 · HealthGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORT…CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION — $5,043 · HealthCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCI…GNOME INC — $4,800 · HealthGNOME INCEnhancing Skills for Life — $3,256 · HealthSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW ENGLAND — $2,500 · Health+1 more — $1,585 · HealthPARADOX SPORTS — $11,094 · Human ServicesPARADOX S…COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES — $6,000 · Human ServicesCOMMON GR…Rochester Accessible Adventures — $5,970 · Human ServicesRochester…SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,040 · Human ServicesSEED COMM…
Recreation & Sports$118,188Other$86,226Health$72,085Human Services$26,104

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCatalyst Sports Inc — $49,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $32,890 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIDE Inc — $26,530 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc — $16,750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJETT FOUNDATION INC — $16,211 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPARADOX SPORTS — $11,094 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTS — $9,900 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetORTHOTIC & PROSTHETIC ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $7,425 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES — $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRochester Accessible Adventures — $5,970 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION — $5,800 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMESA ASSOCIATION OF SPORTS FOR THE DISABLED INC — $5,631 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWorld TEAM Sports — $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION — $5,043 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD BASEBALL ACADEMY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP RISE ABOVE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGNOME INC — $4,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM NEW MEXICO INC — $3,700 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGateways Community Services Inc — $3,473 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEnhancing Skills for Life — $3,256 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,040 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW ENGLAND — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLUKE5ADVENTURES — $1,782 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES — $1,585 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Move UnitedMD30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Move United · Christopher Reeve Foundation · The Hanger Charitable Foundation · Rei Cooperative Action Fund · Joy In Childhood Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dralla Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Gnome Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dralla Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dralla Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph