· Private foundation
Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $834k
- $50k–250k32 grants · $3.4M
- $250k+11 grants · $6.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER | $1,325,000 |
| PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC | $1,000,000 |
| THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC | $1,000,000 |
| ADA TOWNSHIP | $500,000 |
| GERALD R FORD PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS | $500,000 |
| GRAND ACTION FOUNDATION 20 | $325,000 |
| HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY | $325,000 |
| PINE REST CHRISTIAN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES | $250,000 |
| PUBLIC MUSEUM OF GRAND RAPIDS | $250,000 |
| WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY | $250,000 |
| ARTS MARKETPLACE AT STUDIO PARK | $244,080 |
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN | $213,800 |
| STRATEGIC WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS | $150,000 |
| LUIS PALAU ASSOCIATION | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
142 repeat relationships — 68 still active in FY2024, 74 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $8.6M · revenue +119%
Purdue Research Foundation5× · 2020–2024 · $7.2M · revenue +28%- LELEADING EDUCATORS INC3× · 2020–2022 · $3.8M · revenue +124%
Funded once
- CFCENTER FOR SOUND LITERACY FOUNDATIOone grant, 2023 · $1.5M · revenue -47% · 29% of their budget
FII - NATIONALone grant, 2020 · $1.2M · revenue -89%- DPDWELLING PLACE OF GRAND RAPIDS NONPROFITone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.
We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
To communicate the relevance of the life-changing message of jesus christ to youth by example and word and challenging them to trust christ and to live for him.
The right place is the economic development organization that drives current and long-term economic prosperity in west michigan.
The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gilda's Club Grand Rapids and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
179 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 179 of the 239 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Greater Grand Rapids Chamber Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds LEADING EDUCATORS INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds WEST MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Stand Together Foundation ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR SOUND LITERACY FOUNDATIO ↗
- Who funds GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds FII - NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES SAILING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds GRAND ACTION FOUNDATION 20 ↗
- Who funds Living Stones Academy ↗
- Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
- Who funds THE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds K-CONNECT ↗
- Who funds West Michigan Community Tennis Inc ↗
- Who funds WEST MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY INC DBA FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS ↗
- Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019) ↗
- Who funds GERALD R FORD PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SAILING HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Rehoboth Christian School Assoc ↗
- Who funds MACKINAC CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Potters House ↗
- Who funds INNOVATION NETWORK FOR COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Early Learning Neighborhood Collaborative ↗
- Who funds ORLANDO MAGIC YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · Frey Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Daniel & Pamella Devos Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · The Wege Foundation · Steelcase Foundation · The Mercantile Bank Foundation · The David and Carol Van Andel Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mystic Seaport Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.