Skip to content
Double Eagle Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Double Eagle Charities Inc

Double eagle charities, inc.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.5MHealth$1.3MEducation$830kHuman Services$485kCommunity Improvement$400kHousing & Shelter$145kScience & Tech$40kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $1,015,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,041,495 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,495 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $207k
  • $250k+2 grants · $800k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$319k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REFLECTION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS$400,000
THE NET$400,000
BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC$40,000
YOUNG LIFE$40,000
RIVERTREE ACADEMY INC$40,000
HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC$40,000
PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY$37,000
THE ART OF PERFORMANCE$10,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $338k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE FARM INC: $328k → 11%WHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 4 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +133% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$1.6M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+133%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $930k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WI Cook Foundation Inc
    5× · 2018–2024 · $840k · revenue +16%
  • TA
    TEXAS ACADEMY 4
    3× · 2022–2024 · $363k · revenue +171%
  • RA
    RIVERTREE ACADEMY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $286k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • FW
    FORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $650k · revenue +190%
  • RC
    RUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $410k · revenue -19% · 31% of their budget
  • OP
    OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH
    one grant, 2024 · $410k · revenue -83% · 76% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
2
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
3
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
4
The Royal School System

The mission of Royal Public Schools is to spark students' natural curiosity and love of learning while providing the knowledge and skills they need to lead successful and fulfilling lives.

Education
5
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
6
Communities in Schools of Central Texas

Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.

Education
7
Communities in Schools of the South Plains Inc

To meet the needs of students in at-risk situations by improving academics, marketable skills, attendance, and behavior through the partnership of school, home, and community so that young people stay in school, learn successfully and…

Youth Development
8
Trinity School of Midland Texas

The mission of trinity school is to be a college preparatory community that provides a nurturing environment to enrich the mind, strengthen the body, enliven the soul, and inspire servant leadership.

Education
9
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
10
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
11
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
12
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities in Schools of Greater Tarrant County Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER: $650,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREEROPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH: $410,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTHRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $286,000 · Youth DevelopmentRIVERTREE ACADEMY+1 more: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentWI Cook Foundation Inc: $840,000 · HealthWI Cook Foundation IncRUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION: $410,000 · HealthRUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · HealthREFLECTION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS INC: $400,000 · Housing & ShelterREFLECTION M…THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $131,299 · Housing & ShelterTHE PRESBYTE…THE NET FW INC: $400,000 · Community ImprovementTHE NET F…TEXAS ACADEMY 4: $362,500 · Membership BenefitHOPE FARM INC: $327,500 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOLY CROSS CATHOLIC PARISH: $156,000 · OtherHOLY CROS…TRANSFORMATIONS BY AMARILLO ANGELS: $75,000 · OtherTRANSFORM…HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC: $40,000 · OtherHOSPICE O…Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $13,236 · OtherBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC: $40,000 · OtherBOTANICAL…WEST TEXAS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $25,000 · OtherWEST TEXA…BYNUM SCHOOL: $20,000 · Other+3 more: $23,000 · Other+3 more
Youth Development$1,386,000Health$1,260,000Housing & Shelter$531,299Community Improvement$400,000Membership Benefit$362,500Human Services$337,500Other$392,236

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWI Cook Foundation Inc: $840,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER: $650,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION: $410,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetOPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH: $410,000 over 1y, 76% of budgetTEXAS ACADEMY 4: $362,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $327,500 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $286,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $131,299 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTRANSFORMATIONS BY AMARILLO ANGELS: $75,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST TEXAS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $13,236 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Communities Foundatio…Amon G Carter Foundat…Sid W Richardson Foun…Thomas M Helen McKee …Bnsf Railway Foundati…Adeline & George McQu…Paul E Andrews Jr Fou…Helen Irwin Littauer …The Roach Foundation …Rainwater Charitable …Textron Charitable Tr…
Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX26.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Adeline & George McQueen Foundation Xxxxx1007 · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · The Roach Foundation Inc · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Double Eagle Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Double Eagle Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Double Eagle Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Double Eagle Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Double Eagle Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home