Loading…
· Public charity
DOUBLE EAGLE CHARITIES INC
Supports community development, wellness, mentoring, education, & poverty relief in fort worth.
$1.0M
Granted FY2024
9
Grants
1
Communities
$410k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Health$1.3MYouth Development$1.1MMembership Benefit$363kHuman Services$338kHousing & Shelter$94kRecreation & Sports$25kEducation$25kOther$470k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
cook children'scarechildchildren's healthmedical
2019
cook children'scarechildchildren's healthmedical
2020
—
2021
cook children'scarechildchildren's healthmedical
2022
—
2023
comprehensivechildrensocialspiritualneighborhoodsstudentscare
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $94k
- $250k+2 grants · $820k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$324k
Total assets
Largest grants
- RUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION$410,000
- OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH$410,000
- PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY$94,299
- FIRST TEE WEST TEXAS INC$25,000
- TEXAS ACADEMY 4$20,000
- RIVERTREE ACADEMY INC$20,000
- BYNUM SCHOOL$20,000
- WHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC$10,000
- WI COOK FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $338k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 3 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +104% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
7
Total granted
$1.4M
$1.2M
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+104%
+52%
Still filing today
67%
86%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $989k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesMembership BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWI COOK FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2024 · $840k · revenue -39%
- TATEXAS ACADEMY 43× · 2022–2024 · $363k · revenue +104%
- RARIVERTREE ACADEMY2× · 2020–2021 · $226k
Funded once
- TTTARRANT TO & THROUGH PARTNERSHIPgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $650k · revenue +40%
- HFHOPE FARM INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $328k · revenue +27%
- HCHOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $156k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Trinity Charter School
The trinity charter school system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses (cont'd on sch. o) work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through sutdent…
Education
2
The Compass School of Texas
We believe in inquiry-based learning and bringing real-world experiences into the classroom to help students draw connections between lessons and how they can impact the world.
Education
3
Texas College
To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.
Education
4
Texas Charter Schools Association
A statewide membership organization dedicated to promoting effective charter schools of all types.
Education
5
Trinity School of Midland Texas
Trinity school of midland is a college preparatory community that offers an exceptionally enriched program providing children beginning in preschool and going through twelfth grade with experiences in the visual and performing arts,…
Education
6
The Woodlands Christian Academy
TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school.
—
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company
To provide professional investment management and related services for the funds under management and control of the Board of Regents of The University of Texas System.
Education
8
Texas Medical Association
Empowering texas physicians in the practice of medicine.
—
9
Texas Christian University
Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units. instruction is for 12,785 students.
Education
10
Communities in Schools of Central Texas
Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.
Education
11
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council
To advocate the interest and enhance the viability of hospitals in dallas, fort worth, and north texas and to strengthen the relationship of hospitals to the communities they serve
—
12
Tarrant County Medical Society
Supporting and advancing the science of medicine and educating its members.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities in Schools of Greater Tarrant County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Transformations By Amarillo Angels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$1,260,000Youth Development$1,080,000Other$470,236Membership Benefit$362,500Human Services$337,500Housing & Shelter$94,299Recreation & Sports$25,000Education$25,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WI COOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TARRANT TO & THROUGH PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds RUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS ACADEMY 4 ↗
- Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMATION BY AMARILLO ANGELS ↗
- Who funds FIRST TEE WEST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WHAT ABOUT REMEMBERING ME CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation DOUBLE EAGLE CHARITIES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~33 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.4× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 843130758 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 33 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 76% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Double Eagle Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Double Eagle Charities Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines