Skip to content
Doty Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Doty Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHealth$61kPhilanthropy$46kHuman Services$26kYouth Development$23kHousing & Shelter$20kRecreation & Sports$10kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$102,500
LAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION$10,000
TURNING POINT USA$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
MO
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$1.2M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+19%

Still filing today

88%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    Fordham University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $903k · revenue +31%
  • RF
    ROESSLER-CHADWICK FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $130k · revenue +30%
  • THE DOE FUND INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue +7%
  • PT
    PEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSNgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Luke Tatsu Johnson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fordham University: $902,500 · EducationFordham UniversityROESSLER-CHADWICK FOUNDATION: $130,150 · EducationROESSLER-CHADWICK FOUNDATION+2 more: $22,000 · EducationMOMENTUM INNOVATIVE DISABILITY SERVICES: $21,500 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $9,500 · OtherSAINT SEBASTIAN SPORTS PROJECT: $6,000 · OtherPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $5,000 · OtherNEW LIFE BEGINNINGS INC: $4,500 · OtherNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $4,335 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $2,500 · OtherAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $5,000 · OtherCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Other+1 more: $1,500 · OtherLAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION: $45,600 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,500 · PhilanthropyCHOC FOUNDATION: $10,524 · HealthLUKE TATSU JOHNSON FOUNDATION: $6,127 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $5,000 · HealthUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $5,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · HealthPENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,390 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,125 · Human ServicesOPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE DOE FUND INC: $19,500 · Housing & ShelterBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $12,500 · Youth Development
Education$1,054,650Other$72,835Philanthropy$47,100Health$30,041Human Services$28,125Housing & Shelter$19,500Youth Development$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFordham University: $902,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetROESSLER-CHADWICK FOUNDATION: $130,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION: $45,600 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $19,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $10,524 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLong Beach BLAST Better Learning for All Students Today: $10,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $9,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLUKE TATSU JOHNSON FOUNDATION: $6,127 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW LIFE BEGINNINGS INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $4,335 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg Foundat…The Larry and Helen H…Earl B & Loraine H Mi…The Crail-Johnson Fou…California Community …Charities Aid Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
The Annenberg FoundationPA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · The Larry and Helen Hoag Foundation · Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Doty Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Doty Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Doty Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Doty Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Doty Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home