Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Doty Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$1.0MHealth$61kPhilanthropy$46kHuman Services$26kYouth Development$23kHousing & Shelter$20kRecreation & Sports$10kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$102,500
TURNING POINT USA$10,000
LAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,125
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CA
MO
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$1.2M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+19%

Still filing today

88%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    Fordham University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $903k · revenue +31%
  • RF
    ROESSLER-CHADWICK FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $130k · revenue +30%
  • THE DOE FUND INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue +7%
  • PT
    PEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSNgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +95%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Luke Tatsu Johnson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersFallen First Responder Supp…Animal Rescue and AdoptionPregnancy Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Land Conservation Organizat…Community Health CentersSenior Support ServicesVeteran Support ServicesIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr19%4%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%87%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,734

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Fordham University — $902,500 · EducationFordham UniversityROESSLER-CHADWICK FOUNDATION — $130,150 · EducationROESSLER-CHADWICK FOUNDATION+2 more — $22,000 · EducationMOMENTUM INNOVATIVE DISABILITY SERVICES — $21,500 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC — $10,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $9,500 · OtherSAINT SEBASTIAN SPORTS PROJECT — $6,000 · OtherPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK — $5,000 · OtherNEW LIFE BEGINNINGS INC — $4,500 · OtherNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC — $4,335 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $2,500 · OtherAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION — $5,000 · OtherCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Other+1 more — $1,500 · OtherLAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION — $45,600 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,500 · PhilanthropyCHOC FOUNDATION — $10,524 · HealthLUKE TATSU JOHNSON FOUNDATION — $6,127 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $5,000 · HealthUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC — $5,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $2,000 · HealthPENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $1,390 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,125 · Human ServicesOPERATION BBQ RELIEF — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE DOE FUND INC — $19,500 · Housing & ShelterBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH — $12,500 · Youth Development
Education$1,054,650Other$72,835Philanthropy$47,100Health$30,041Human Services$28,125Housing & Shelter$19,500Youth Development$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFordham University — $902,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetROESSLER-CHADWICK FOUNDATION — $130,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION — $45,600 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC — $19,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $10,524 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLong Beach BLAST Better Learning for All Students Today — $10,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $9,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLUKE TATSU JOHNSON FOUNDATION — $6,127 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW LIFE BEGINNINGS INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC — $4,335 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BBQ RELIEF — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg FoundationPA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · The Larry and Helen Hoag Foundation · Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Doty Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Doty Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Doty Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph