A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of DOROTHY G & STANLEY E WORDEN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

christiancoastal

2019

church god

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $30k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

COLLEGE BAPTIST CHURCH HILLSDALE$50,000
TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION$5,000
PIONEERS$5,000
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$5,000
EAST-WEST$5,000
lINCOLN ACADEMY$5,000
DAMARISCOTTA BAPTIST CHURCH$2,000
BRUNSWICK CHURCH OF NAZARENE$1,000
ALMOST HOME RESCUE$1,000
DEAN SNELL CANCER FOUNDATION$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$373k · 13 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$373k

$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%

+10%

Still filing today

23%

36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterAnimalsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SS
STEPPING STONE HOUSING
5× · 2017–2022 · $96k · revenue +374%
CK
COASTAL KIDS PRESCHOOL
6× · 2017–2023 · $65k · revenue +63%
TO
TOWN OF DAMARISCOTTA
3× · 2018–2023 · $62k

Funded once

EN
ELDERCARE NETWORK
one grant, 2020 · $25k
JF
JONI & FRIENDS NEW ENGLAND
one grant, 2019 · $20k
HG
HODGDON GREEN
one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Heritage Christian School

Partner with parents to provide biblically faithful, academically excellent education.

—

Living Stones Academy

To be a neighborhood Christian school committed to inspiring the minds and hearts of students; equipping them to embrace cultural, economic and racial diversity; and empowering them to love and serve in community.

Education

Hope Harbor Inc

Hope Harbor offers an immersive family reconciliation program designed to give your family the tools and support you need to navigate the storm, so you can enjoy peace and hope in your home. Hope Harbor serves adolescents and their…

Human Services

Homestead Christian Academy Inc

Homestead christian academy strives to achieve and to empower students today for a better tomorrow by providing them the right education, nutrition and social skills

Education

Cornerstone Ministries Inc

Cornerstone ministries provides a home where adults with special needs can experience abundant life. built on christian values, its family-centric environment creates a safe place where independence thrives, character grows, and confidence…

Health

Holy Nativity Christian Child Care

Holy nativity christian child care center is a ministry of holy nativity lutheran church. our purpose is to serve families by providing a high quality christian childcare program. our goal is to promote the development and well-being of…

Religion

Horizon Christian School

Private education: pre-kindergarten - 12th grade. our mission is to build a solid foundation for life by providing students with an excellent education that integrates academic achievement, biblical truth, and christ-like character.

Education

Christian Schools Inc

Education - Private Christian SchoolGrades K - 12

—

Minnewaska Lutheran Home

Nursing home a community of services grounded in faith providing person centered care

—

Christ the King Christian Academy

To educate children in a sound christian based environment. the education will be holistic in its approach.

Education

Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education

Sonshine Day Preschool Inc

Sonshine day preschools mission is to partner with the home and church to provide a loving, secure christian environment where dedicated staff care for, nuture, and teach young children to know, honor, and serve god.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Academy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stepping Stone Housing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/17

Grantees still filing

13/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$406,338Housing & Shelter$96,000Human Services$95,500Arts & Culture$21,357Education$10,000Public Benefit$5,000Animals$4,000Religion$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Marjorie C Bailey Charitable FoundationME24.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Marjorie C Bailey Charitable Foundation · Reny Charitable Foundation · The Audrey P Connor Charitable Foundation · The Ruth J Jones Charitable Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DOROTHY G & STANLEY E WORDEN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: STEPPING STONE HOUSING.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 464169760 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on STEPPING STONE HOUSING, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Dorothy G & Stanley E Worden Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dorothy G & Stanley E Worden Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DOROTHY G & STANLEY E WORDEN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dorothy G & Stanley E Worden Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph

DOROTHY G & STANLEY E WORDEN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dorothy G & Stanley E Worden Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph