· Private foundation
Leach Elizabeth Ann Pfdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $113k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAINE HEALTH LINCOLN HOSPITAL | $50,000 |
| HEALTHY LINCOLN COUNTY | $25,000 |
| BOOTHBAY SEA AND SCIENCE CENTER | $15,000 |
| BOOTHBAY REGION DISTRICT NURSING INC | $12,500 |
| LINCOLN COUNTY TELEVISION | $10,000 |
| MIDCOAST HUMANE | $10,000 |
| HEARTY ROOTS | $10,000 |
| TWIN VILLAGES FOODBANK FARM | $10,000 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| MAINE COAST FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| WAYFINDER SCHOOLS | $8,000 |
| DA PONTE STRING QUARTET FDN | $5,000 |
| BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIENCES | $5,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF MAINE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region3× · 2019–2021 · $153k · revenue +33%
- GSGood Shepherd Food Bank6× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +79%
- MHMIDCOAST HUMANE6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- LLINCOLNHEALTHone grant, 2019 · $55k · revenue 0%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $20k
- CRCOMMUNITY RESOURCE COUNCILone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.
Penobscot Bay Medical Center (PBMC) is an acute care hospital that offers inpatient and outpatient care, diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitative services, patient and community education, and a full range of specialty services through…
Maine Behavioral Healthcare provides a seamless and compassionate continuum of care through a community of providers collaborating to promote recovery and the overall mental and physical well-being of those we are privileged to serve.
We conserve land permanently to benefit the natural and human communities of western the Penobscot Bay region.
MaineHealth is a voluntary, not-for-profit community and referral system of hospitals, dedicated to providing high quality health care services to all persons who seek care regardless of their sex, race, religion, age, color, sexual…
Maine & Company is a private, non-profit business development sales organization. Its purpose is to improve Maine's success in attracting new business and expanding and retaining existing business by providing a focused, statewide sales…
The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…
Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…
The Corporation operates for the purpose of providing medical & health services, including primary & specialized care, through licensed physicians & other health professionals primarily in Lincoln County, Maine. Effective February 5, 2023…
To conserve lands with significant ecological or cultural resources and manage them in a sustainable way for public benefit.
Loon Echo Land Trust protects land in the northern Sebago Lake region to conserve its natural resources and character for future generations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Maine and the most unlike its peers is Lincoln County Television. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LincolnHealth Group ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
- Who funds MIDCOAST HUMANE ↗
- Who funds Medical Care Development Inc ↗
- Who funds HEARTY ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds BOOTHBAY SEA AND SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds LINCOLNHEALTH ↗
- Who funds WAYFINDER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Jobs for Maine's Graduates Inc ↗
- Who funds Midcoast Conservancy ↗
- Who funds ELDERCARE NETWORK OF LINCOLN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Boothbay Region Housing Trust ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Maine ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens Inc ↗
- Who funds COASTAL KIDS PRESCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Boothbay Region Land Trust ↗
- Who funds CHIP INC ↗
- Who funds BOOTHBAY REGION STUDENT AID FUND IN ↗
- Who funds Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences ↗
- Who funds MAINE COAST FISHERMENS ASSN ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN COUNTY TELEVISION ↗
- Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT SUPPORT SERVICES OF MIDCOAST MAINE ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN COUNTY DENTAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE NETWORK DBA NETWORK LOBBY FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Volunteers of America Northern New England ↗
- Who funds DAPONTE STRING QUARTET FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Reny Charitable Foundation · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Mildred H McEvoy Foundation · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Burns Family Foundation Inc · Horizon Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leach Elizabeth Ann Pfdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.