Skip to content

· Private foundation

Don Jacobs Sr Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$5.0MHealth$1.9MHuman Services$175kInternational$130kReligion$100kRecreation & Sports$80kEmployment$55kArts & Culture$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $500k
  • $250k+1 grant · $360k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HOPE CENTER$360,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$200,000
UK MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION$150,000
THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION$100,000
WORLDWIDE HEARTS AND HANDS$50,000
ONE PARENT SCHOLAR HOUSE$25,000
TROY DREAM CENTER INC$25,000
TOWN BRANCH PARK$20,000
JUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON$15,000
CHRYSALIS HOUSE$15,000
OPERALEX ENCORE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE BLUEGRASS INC$10,000
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS$10,000
GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%TROY DREAM CENTER INC: $25k → 10%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS: $10k → 15%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.4M · 17 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +64% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$7.4M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+64%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOPE CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $884k · revenue +109%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $785k · revenue +118%
  • TL
    THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • KC
    KENTUCKY CONFERENCE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • OE
    OPERALEX ENCORE 2022
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • OI
    OPERALEX INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope of Kentucky Inc

To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…

Health
2
The Gentry House Inc

The gentry house, inc. is an emergency transitional homeless shelter to help families with children in the region of murray and calloway county, ky. residents are given rent and utility assistance.

—
3
Shelter of Hope Inc

The shelter of hope's mission is to provide temporary, emergency shelter and permanent housing assistance for individuals and families in need of transitional services leading them to self-sufficiency. provisions are made without…

Housing & Shelter
4
Room in the Inn Bowling Green Inc

Provides shelter for the homeless

Housing & Shelter
5
Baptist Healthcare System Inc

The mission of Baptist Health is to exemplify our Christian heritage of providing quality healthcare services by enhancing the physical & emotional health of the people & communities we serve, guided by integrity, respect, stewardship,…

Health
6
Keith Dixon Foundation

Our mission is to provide high-quality recovery housing and recovery support services to individuals struggling with substance use disorder in Tennessee. We believe that our actions speak louder than our words. Since our inception in 2021,…

Philanthropy
7
Kentucky Social Welfare Foundation
—
8
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
9
Lift Up Lexington Inc

Operation Secret Santa delivers Christmas magic by meeting families exactly where they are; right at their doorstep. Our mission is to remove all barriers to access by providing gifts food and essential support directly to households…

Human Services
10
Faith Mountain Mission of Kentucky Inc
Youth Development
11
The Lazarus Project of Knoxville Llc

To provide residential recover programs to and rehabilitate individuals dealing with substance abuse addictions to enter society as productive members

—
12
People's Self-Help Housing Inc

The mission of the organization is to meet the housing needs of low- income families in lewis county through home repairs and rehabilitation, new home construction, managing and maintaining affordable rental housing by providing rental…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grin Grant Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $5,013,366 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $784,929 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC+12 more: $352,500 · Other+12 moreTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $883,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOPE CENT…THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyWORLDWIDE HEARTS AND HANDS INC: $110,000 · InternationalJunior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc: $20,000 · InternationalTOWN BRANCH PARK INC: $80,000 · Recreation & SportsCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC: $65,000 · HealthGrin Grant Inc: $7,500 · HealthJUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC: $47,500 · Employment
Other$6,150,795Housing & Shelter$883,500Philanthropy$175,000International$130,000Recreation & Sports$80,000Health$72,500Employment$47,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $883,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $784,929 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetONE PARENT FAMILY FACILITY CORPORATION: $130,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetWORLDWIDE HEARTS AND HANDS INC: $110,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetTOWN BRANCH PARK INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC: $47,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJunior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGrin Grant Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERALEX INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetUNITING VOICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE PARENT FAMILY FACILITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLDWIDE HEARTS AND HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds TOWN BRANCH PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds TROY DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS OF THE BLUEGRASS INC ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc ↗
  • Who funds Grin Grant Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERALEX INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITING VOICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Alex G Campbell Jr Foundation Inc · Christian Word Ministries Inc · Hilary Boone Foundation Inc · Rosenstein Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Keeneland Foundation Inc · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Elhapa Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Don Jacobs Sr Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Don Jacobs Sr Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Don Jacobs Sr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph