Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Don Jacobs Sr Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$5.0MHealth$1.9MHuman Services$175kInternational$130kReligion$100kRecreation & Sports$80kEmployment$55kArts & Culture$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $500k
  • $250k+1 grant · $360k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HOPE CENTER$360,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$200,000
UK MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION$150,000
THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION$100,000
WORLDWIDE HEARTS AND HANDS$50,000
ONE PARENT SCHOLAR HOUSE$25,000
TROY DREAM CENTER INC$25,000
TOWN BRANCH PARK$20,000
JUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON$15,000
CHRYSALIS HOUSE$15,000
OPERALEX ENCORE$10,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE BLUEGRASS INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS$10,000
GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%TROY DREAM CENTER INC: $25k → 10%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS: $10k → 15%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.4M · 17 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +64% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$7.4M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+64%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOPE CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $884k · revenue +109%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $785k · revenue +118%
  • TL
    THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • KC
    KENTUCKY CONFERENCE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • OE
    OPERALEX ENCORE 2022
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • OI
    OPERALEX INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +64%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope of Kentucky Inc

To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…

Health
2
The Gentry House Inc

The gentry house, inc. is an emergency transitional homeless shelter to help families with children in the region of murray and calloway county, ky. residents are given rent and utility assistance.

3
Shelter of Hope Inc

The shelter of hope's mission is to provide temporary, emergency shelter and permanent housing assistance for individuals and families in need of transitional services leading them to self-sufficiency. provisions are made without…

Housing & Shelter
4
Room in the Inn Bowling Green Inc

Provides shelter for the homeless

Housing & Shelter
5
Baptist Healthcare System Inc

The mission of Baptist Health is to exemplify our Christian heritage of providing quality healthcare services by enhancing the physical & emotional health of the people & communities we serve, guided by integrity, respect, stewardship,…

Health
6
Keith Dixon Foundation

Our mission is to provide high-quality recovery housing and recovery support services to individuals struggling with substance use disorder in Tennessee. We believe that our actions speak louder than our words. Since our inception in 2021,…

Philanthropy
7
Kentucky Social Welfare Foundation
8
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
9
Lift Up Lexington Inc

Operation Secret Santa delivers Christmas magic by meeting families exactly where they are; right at their doorstep. Our mission is to remove all barriers to access by providing gifts food and essential support directly to households…

Human Services
10
Faith Mountain Mission of Kentucky Inc
Youth Development
11
The Lazarus Project of Knoxville Llc

To provide residential recover programs to and rehabilitate individuals dealing with substance abuse addictions to enter society as productive members

12
People's Self-Help Housing Inc

The mission of the organization is to meet the housing needs of low- income families in lewis county through home repairs and rehabilitation, new home construction, managing and maintaining affordable rental housing by providing rental…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grin Grant Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY — $5,013,366 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $784,929 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC+12 more — $352,500 · Other+12 moreTHE HOPE CENTER INC — $883,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOPE CENT…THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · PhilanthropyBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyWORLDWIDE HEARTS AND HANDS INC — $110,000 · InternationalJunior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc — $20,000 · InternationalTOWN BRANCH PARK INC — $80,000 · Recreation & SportsCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC — $65,000 · HealthGrin Grant Inc — $7,500 · HealthJUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC — $47,500 · Employment
Other$6,150,795Housing & Shelter$883,500Philanthropy$175,000International$130,000Recreation & Sports$80,000Health$72,500Employment$47,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC — $883,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $784,929 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetONE PARENT FAMILY FACILITY CORPORATION — $130,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetWORLDWIDE HEARTS AND HANDS INC — $110,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetTOWN BRANCH PARK INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC — $65,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC — $47,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS OF THE BLUEGRASS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJunior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGrin Grant Inc — $7,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERALEX INC — $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetUNITING VOICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ONE PARENT FAMILY FACILITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds WORLDWIDE HEARTS AND HANDS INC
  • Who funds TOWN BRANCH PARK INC
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds JUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC
  • Who funds TROY DREAM CENTER INC
  • Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS OF THE BLUEGRASS INC
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc
  • Who funds Grin Grant Inc
  • Who funds GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds OPERALEX INC
  • Who funds UNITING VOICES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Alex G Campbell Jr Foundation Inc · Christian Word Ministries Inc · Hilary Boone Foundation Inc · Rosenstein Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Keeneland Foundation Inc · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Elhapa Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Don Jacobs Sr Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph