· Private foundation
Keeneland Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| ED BROWN SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| LEXINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| YMCA OF CENTRAL KY | $10,000 |
| DV8 KITCHEN VOCATIONAL TRAINING FOUNDATION | $8,500 |
| LEXINGTON PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA FOUNDATION INC | $7,000 |
| LEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER | $5,256 |
| FOODCHAIN INC | $5,000 |
| GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC | $5,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE BLUEGRASS INC | $5,000 |
| EXPLORIUM OF LEXINGTONLEXINGTON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| LEXINGTON HISTORY MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| CENTER FOR WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC | $5,000 |
| CENTRAL KENTUCKY RIDING FOR HOPE INC | $3,900 |
| KENTUCKY EQUINE ADOPTION CENTER | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LILEXARTS INC3× · 2021–2023 · $180k · revenue +14%
- GCGRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC4× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue +30%
- LPLEXINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2025 · $75k · revenue +135%
Funded once
- PDPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INCone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +16%
- KLKEENELAND LIBRARY AND MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $52k · revenue ×51
- EFEKU FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Civiclex strengthens civic health in lexington, kentucky, by helping our community understand and get involved in local issues, connect with their neighbors and make decisions in a better way.
To increase access to the courts and high-quality legal representation for people with low and moderate incomes living in kentucky through innovative partnerships with the judiciary, the civil legal aid programs, private bar, law schools,…
To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.
Healthfirst provides outpatient primary healthcare, behavioral health and dental services to the underserved and uninsured residents of fayette county and surrounding counties in kentucky.
Kentucky Habitat for Humanity's purpose is to work on a statewide level to create partnerships, financial resources, and educational programs to support the mission of building decent, affordable, and sustainable homes and communities for…
At kentucky blood center, our mission is to ensure a safe and abundant supply of lifegiving blood to the hospitals we serve. we are here to support our local communities in any way that we are able by being an integral and valued partner…
To empower people in their own recovery with a welcoming community-driven sanctuary to connect with one another, heal, feel accepted, loved and worthy of success in their life.
Our mission is to enrich and connect our community through welcoming spaces, engaged staff, diverse resources, and lifelong learning opportunities. we create a stronger community by meeting our customers where and how they need us and…
To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…
To provide exclusively for the benefit, aid, relief, and assistance of the racing personnel employed in connection with horse racing who can demonstrate their need for financial assistance.
Horse country, inc. is a coordinated equine industry initiative to connect guests to the horse, land, and people of kentucky's signature equine industry through immerserive experiences at unique member locations. horse country, inc.…
To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lexington Children's Theatre Inc and the most unlike its peers is Keeneland Library and Museum Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEXARTS INC ↗
- Who funds PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BLUEGRASS INC ↗
- Who funds KEENELAND LIBRARY AND MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ED BROWN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DV8 KITCHEN VOCATIONAL TRAINING FOUNDATI ON INC ↗
- Who funds STABLE RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds MAP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LEXINGTON KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds GOVERNOR'S SCHOLARS PROGRAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASBURY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL KENTUCKY RIDING FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds OLD LADIES HOME D/B/A ASHLAND TERRACE ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SAYRE CHRISTIAN VILLAGE NURSING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds HONOR FLIGHT KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds American Horse Council Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON HISTORY MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds BABY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · The King's Daughters and Sons Foundation of Kentucky Inc · Roaring Brook Foundation Inc · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · Christian Word Ministries Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Hilary Boone Foundation Inc · Elhapa Foundation Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Keeneland Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Keeneland Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Keeneland Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.