· Private foundation
Doherty Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GIVEMN | $49,500 |
| RED CROSS | $10,000 |
| ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY | $8,347 |
| GARY SINESE FOUNDATION | $7,653 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,066 |
| LOAVES AND FISHES | $6,934 |
| NAWBO | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND | $5,000 |
| MY GOOD DEED | $4,500 |
| SUSAN G KOMEN | $3,621 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $3,295 |
| BE THE MATCH FOUNDATION | $1,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GGIVEMN4× · 2021–2024 · $168k · revenue +2%
- UGUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC5× · 2018–2022 · $33k · revenue +220%
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +47%
Funded once
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -19%- VIVEAP Incone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -10%
- PFPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
End hunger together.
Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice. WFM applies an Intersectional Equity Framework inclusive of gender, race,…
Avivo increases well-being through recovery and career advancement while working to end homelessness.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Youthprise is a nonprofit intermediary that invests in the future of Minnesota by investing in youth. Youthprise's mission is to increase equity with and for Minnesota's indigenous, low-income, and racially diverse youth.
The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…
The open door is a leading hunger-relief organization serving dakota county, minnesota, where food insecurity is a growing challenge. the open door is dedicated to ending local hunger by providing access to healthy, fresh, and nutritious…
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hmong American Partnership and the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GIVEMN ↗
- Who funds Animal Humane Society ↗
- Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds The Lift Garage ↗
- Who funds SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds 911 DAY ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPEN YOUR HEART TO THE HUNGRY AND HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds HALLIE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
- Who funds AVENUES FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds VEAP Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
- Who funds TUBMAN ↗
- Who funds NAWBO INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds YOUTHLINK ↗
- Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
- Who funds GOOD IN THE 'HOOD ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds YouthCARE ↗
- Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHEERFUL GIVERS ↗
- Who funds INNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Bridging Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Edina Realty Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Pohlad Family Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Target Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Doherty Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.