Skip to content

Colorado · Public charity

Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

$365k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2024
4
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$101k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$19,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$40,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 6
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$33M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Denver Zoological Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 77% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentAnimalsScience & TechArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$101k20%
FY20234$82k50%
FY20222$16k50%
FY20212$20k50%
FY20204$48k25%
FY20193$45k33%
FY20183$22k33%
FY20176$64kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$143kEnvironment$120kEducation$96kScience & Tech$40k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Colorado State University$80,0002n/a
New Mexico Highlands University$61,5054n/a
International Elephant Foundation$55,00043%
Rewild$45,00020%
Conservation Science Partners Inc$30,19421%
Rocky Mountain Wild$28,26934%
Smithsonian Institution$24,60030%
Wildlife Conservation Society$19,50010%
Idea Wild Inc$15,0003n/a
Moore Hydrology LLC$12,0281n/a
Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Denver Zoological Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Colorado State University$80,0002n/a
New Mexico Highlands University$61,5054n/a
International Elephant Foundation$55,00043%
Rewild$45,00020%
Conservation Science Partners Inc$30,19421%
Rocky Mountain Wild$28,26934%
Smithsonian Institution$24,60030%
Wildlife Conservation Society$19,50010%
Idea Wild Inc$15,0003n/a
Moore Hydrology LLC$12,0281n/a
Regents of the University of Colorado$9,9471n/a
Hermits Peak Watershed Alliance$7,50012%
The Trust for Public Land$5,00010%
American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Inc$5,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Denver Zoological Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Elephant Foundation: $55,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetRewild: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetConservation Science Partners Inc: $30,194 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetRocky Mountain Wild: $28,269 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetSmithsonian Institution: $24,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $19,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHermits Peak Watershed Alliance: $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Trust for Public Land: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Denver Zoological Foundation with peer funders

About Denver Zoological Foundation

How much does Denver Zoological Foundation give?
Denver Zoological Foundation reported 5 itemized grants totaling $101,400, out of $364,958 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Denver Zoological Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (36%), Environment (30%), Education (24%).
Who are Denver Zoological Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Colorado State University ($80k), New Mexico Highlands University ($62k), International Elephant Foundation ($55k).
Does Denver Zoological Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Denver Zoological Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Denver Zoological Foundation based?
Denver Zoological Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Denver Zoological’s filings →

More from the funding graph