Skip to content
Delivering Good Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Delivering Good Inc

Delivering good helps people facing hardship and disaster move forward by working with our partners to match them with new, essential items and services - providing care that supports dignity, renews hope, and opens doors to opportunity.

$155M
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$208kFood & Nutrition$200kPublic Safety & Disaster$195kInternational$156kPhilanthropy$150kRecreation & Sports$115k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $85,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $154,969,459 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $154,884,459 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCY INCORPORATED$35,000
RAZOM INC$25,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50k → 10%CARING FOR OTHERS: $23k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
CA
MO
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$486k · 4 repeat orgs$438k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +106% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$486k
$353k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+43%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22
InternationalPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FARM SHARE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $175k · revenue +106%
  • NY
    NEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $135k · revenue +83%
  • CB
    CARLOS BELTRAN BASEBALL ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $115k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • FY
    FUNDACION YO NO ME QUITO INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -97%
  • MC
    METHODIST CHURCH OF PUERTO RICO
    one grant, 2018 · $75k
  • GE
    GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INCgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +816%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth Crisis Center Inc

The mission of YCC is to build a healthier community by empowering young people and families to rise above adversity.

Human Services
2
Bethany House Services Inc

Bethany house services empowers homeless and at-risk families with the solutions to achieve housing stability and long-term self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
3
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
4
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
5
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
6
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
7
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
8
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
9
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
10
Diaspora Community Services Inc

diaspora community services is a social support service agency that empowers low income families and individuals to maximize their abilities to overcome obstacles to their well-being and self-sufficiency.

—
11
Family Crisis Network

The organization serves homeless low income and displaced persons with housing food clothing and transportation expenses. our advocates also assist persons who are victims of domestic violence abuse or general crime.

—
12
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fostering Hope Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Worth Fighting 4. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

683 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
188
Early backer (in before they grew)
636/683
Grantees still filing
493/683
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $135,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAIT…ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $61,460 · Public Safety & DisasterISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITAR…GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $55,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION …FARM SHARE INC: $175,000 · Food & NutritionFARM SHARE INCBANCO DE ALIMENTOS PUERTO RICO INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionBANCO DE ALIMENTOS PUE…FUNDACION YO NO ME QUITO INC: $100,200 · PhilanthropyFUNDACION YO NO …COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDA…METHODIST CHURCH OF PUERTO RICO: $75,000 · OtherMETHODIST CHU…HOUSTON AREA URBAN LEAGUE INC: $50,000 · OtherHOUSTON AREA …CARLOS BELTRAN BASEBALL ACADEMY INC: $115,000 · Recreation & SportsCARLOS BELTR…Mercy Incorporated: $35,000 · InternationalMercy Incor…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…RAZOM INC: $25,000 · InternationalRAZOM INCCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $15,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S …JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50,000 · Human ServicesCARING FOR OTHERS INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesHEROES CARE INC: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Public Safety & Disaster$251,460Food & Nutrition$200,000Philanthropy$150,200Other$125,000Recreation & Sports$115,000International$100,000Human Services$73,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFARM SHARE INC: $175,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $135,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCARLOS BELTRAN BASEBALL ACADEMY INC: $115,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $61,460 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $55,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON AREA URBAN LEAGUE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMercy Incorporated: $35,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARING FOR OTHERS INC: $23,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHEROES CARE INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Toy Foundation IncThe New World Foundat…The Gap FoundationOne Warm CoatZumiez FoundationFeed the Children IncIn-N-Out Burgers Foun…Good360Shelter Partnership I…Mary Kay Ash Foundati…Soles4souls IncBobs Discount Furnitu…
The Toy Foundation IncNY120.7× affinity82 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Toy Foundation Inc · The New World Foundation · The Gap Foundation · One Warm Coat · Zumiez Foundation · Feed the Children Inc · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Good360 · Shelter Partnership Inc · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Soles4souls Inc · Bobs Discount Furniture Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Delivering Good Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Delivering Good Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Farm Share Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $132M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Delivering Good’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home