Skip to content

· Private foundation

Day Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$241k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$158k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$558kEducation$145kAnimals$133kCrime & Legal$57kHuman Services$11kInternational$4kEnvironment$3kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $158k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH MAIN BAPTIST CHURCH$158,000
ST AGNES ACADEMY$25,000
UT MCCOMBS PARENT COUNSEL$20,000
LOLAS LUCKY DAY$16,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT$1,620
SSWSC$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$1,500
BOWERY MISSION$1,500
ROUTT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$1,200
CAITIE'S FOSTER FARM$1,000
FAMILY LEGACY MISSIONS$864
Individual grant recipient$702
Individual grant recipient$260
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CORE: $1k → 14%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $5k → 16%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $2k → 16%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $1k → 16%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $2k → 17%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $200 → 16%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
CO
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$963k · 13 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$963k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+18%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesReligionHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HOUSTON PETSET
    4× · 2020–2023 · $26k · revenue +6%
  • NC
    Nehemiah Center Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +26%
  • RP
    RESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • B
    BEAR
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
2
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
3
Chances - Dog Rescue and Relocation

Animal Rescue

—
4
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
5
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
6
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
7
Rescue Coop
Animals
8
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
9
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
10
Dorchester Paws

Dorchester Paws strives to instill humane principles into society through the prevention of cruelty to animals.

Animals
11
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
12
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emancipet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Core. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH MAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $545,000 · OtherSOUTH MAIN BAPTIST CHURCHST AGNES ACADEMY: $137,923 · OtherST AGNES ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $70,850 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUT MCCOMBS PARENT COUNSEL: $55,000 · OtherUT MCCOMBS PARENT COUNSEL+14 more: $23,404 · OtherLOLAS LUCKY DAY INC: $93,505 · AnimalsLOLAS LUCKY DAY…HOUSTON PETSET: $25,509 · AnimalsHOUSTON PETSETRESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC: $7,000 · AnimalsSWEET LIFE RESCUE CENTER: $5,100 · Animals+1 more: $1,023 · AnimalsNehemiah Center Inc: $8,838 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $1,620 · Human ServicesCORE: $1,060 · Human ServicesTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON: $500 · Human ServicesChristian Herald Association Inc: $7,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 · ReligionCLEAN OCEAN ACTION INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $1,500 · EnvironmentVICTORY HOUSTON INC: $1,115 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthEMERGENCY AID COALITION: $500 · Food & NutritionThe Periwinkle Foundation: $400 · Philanthropy
Other$832,177Animals$132,137Human Services$12,018Religion$10,000Environment$3,000Health$1,615Food & Nutrition$500Philanthropy$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOLAS LUCKY DAY INC: $93,505 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetHOUSTON PETSET: $25,509 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNehemiah Center Inc: $8,838 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSWEET LIFE RESCUE CENTER: $5,100 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $1,620 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN OCEAN ACTION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRoutt County Humane Society: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVICTORY HOUSTON INC: $1,115 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMANCIPET INC: $1,023 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY AID COALITION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Periwinkle Foundation: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOLAS LUCKY DAY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON PETSET ↗
  • Who funds Nehemiah Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SWEET LIFE RESCUE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN OCEAN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Routt County Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds VICTORY HOUSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds CORE ↗
  • Who funds EMANCIPET INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY AID COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FLATWATER FOUNDATON ↗
  • Who funds The Periwinkle Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX18.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Day Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Day Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Day Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Day Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Day Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph