Skip to content

· Private foundation

David and Susan Schoenholz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$455k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.4MFood & Nutrition$263kAnimals$250kHuman Services$165kArts & Culture$80kSocial Science$35kReligion$25kInternational$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $313k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$150,000
ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY$62,700
MANNA FOOD BANK$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
DEPAUL UNIVERSITY$37,500
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$25,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTE$25,000
BREVARD MUSIC CENTER$15,000
HENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSION$10,000
WALNUT COVE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
NORTH CAROLINE ARBORETUM SOCIETY$5,000
EBLEN CHARITIES$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF ASHEVILLE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTE: $25k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 18 repeat orgs$915k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$1.4M
$803k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+58%

Still filing today

61%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $350k · revenue +3%
  • AH
    ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $183k · revenue +196%
  • MANNA FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $180k · revenue +204%

Funded once

  • DU
    Duke University
    one grant, 2024 · $550k
  • MF
    Manna Foodbank
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • AH
    Asheville Humane Society
    one grant, 2024 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
North Carolina Medical Society

To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.

—
4
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
5
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
6
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
7
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
8
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education
11
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
12
State Employees' Credit Union

To be the trusted provider of financial services to every eligible member and to enhance the quality of their lives and financial well-being while maintaining our fiscal strength.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Diocese of Charlotte; the most unlike its peers is Smile Train Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Duke University: $550,000 · OtherDuke UniversitySALVATION ARMY: $110,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYTrident Technical College: $90,000 · OtherTrident Technical CollegeManna Foodbank: $75,000 · OtherManna FoodbankEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONAsheville Humane Society: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherA-B Tech Community College: $50,000 · Other+16 more: $236,000 · Other+16 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $350,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTrinity International University: $125,000 · EducationTrinity International Univer…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $80,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $37,500 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITYASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $182,700 · Animals+1 more: $2,500 · AnimalsMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $180,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCatholic Charities Diocese of Charlotte: $50,200 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · InternationalWALNUT COVE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,296,000Education$592,500Animals$185,200Food & Nutrition$185,000Human Services$50,200International$20,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $350,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $182,700 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $180,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTrinity International University: $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $80,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities Diocese of Charlotte: $50,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $19,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWALNUT COVE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe North Carolina Arboretum Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Trinity International University ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Diocese of Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WALNUT COVE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Eblen Charities Inc ↗
  • Who funds The North Carolina Arboretum Society ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Dogwood Health Trust · Walnut Cove Members Association Inc · Pisgah Health Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David and Susan Schoenholz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David and Susan Schoenholz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David and Susan Schoenholz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph