Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

David and Katherine Moore Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18M
Granted FY2023
70
Grants FY2023
12
States reached
$5.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.

Philanthropy$12MCivil Rights$1.7MEnvironment$1.2MHealth$685kPublic Benefit$535kHuman Services$526kEducation$513kInternational$245kArts & Culture$203kOther$8.9M
02FY2023 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k13 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $955k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $580k
  • $250k+3 grants · $17M
$21,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAVID & LENI MOORE FOUNDATION II$5,596,230
RICHARD AND BARBARA MOORE FAMILY FOUNDATION$5,591,908
TIMOTHY & DEBORAH MOORE FAMILY FOUNDATION$5,591,908
PULITZER CENTER FOR CRISIS REPORTING$100,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$90,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$75,000
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$65,000
THE RIVER NETWORK$50,000
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLICY CENTER$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE$50,000
AMERICAN RIVERS$50,000
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$50,000
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER$45,000
BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK$40,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $526k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $40k → 17%FINANCIAL CLINIC: $15k → 20%BOSTON HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $13k → 16%BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $40k → 17%VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $5k → 22%BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $40k → 17%VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $5k → 22%BOSTON HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $13k → 16%VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $2k → 22%VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $500 → 22%BOSTON HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $13k → 16%VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $500 → 22%BOSTON HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $13k → 16%BOSTON HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $13k → 16%BOSTON HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $13k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $3k → 16%CARVER CENTER: $15k → 9%CARVER CENTER: $15k → 9%CARVER CENTER: $15k → 9%CARVER CENTER: $15k → 9%CARVER CENTER: $15k → 9%CARVER CENTER: $15k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO: $20k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO: $20k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO: $20k → 9%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.9M · 77 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

77 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2023, 19 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

77
12

Total granted

$8.9M
$176k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+36%

Still filing today

78%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING
    5× · 2017–2023 · $530k · revenue +227%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $450k · revenue +12%
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $380k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue -24%
  • CM
    Change Machine
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -50%
  • YN
    YALE NORFOLK SCHOOL OF ART
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
3
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Partnership to End Homelessness Inc and the most unlike its peers is Timothy and Deborah Moore Family. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community College Foundatio…Lgbtq+ Community SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Community Arts CentersJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsPregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%58%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr19%11%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 58% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/81
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,679

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/80
Grantees still filing
62/80
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TIMOTHY AND DEBORAH MOORE FAMILY — $5,591,908 · PhilanthropyTIMOTHY AND DEBORAH MOORE FAMILYRICHARD AND BARBARA MOORE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $5,591,908 · PhilanthropyRICHARD AND BARBARA MOORE FAMILY FOUNDATION INCTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $425,000 · Philanthropy+5 more — $678,000 · Philanthropy+5 moreDAVID & LENI MOORE FOUNDATION II — $5,596,230 · OtherDAVID & LENI MOORE FOUNDATION II+64 more — $4,254,189 · Other+64 moreTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $380,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $360,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $320,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $200,000 · Civil RightsMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND — $165,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC — $150,000 · Civil RightsASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC — $70,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $7,000 · Civil RightsRIVER NETWORK — $350,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $350,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST — $290,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN WATER FUND — $200,000 · Environment+1 more — $17,500 · EnvironmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $450,000 · HealthHUMAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WESTCHESTER INC — $135,000 · HealthWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center — $50,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC — $45,000 · Health+1 more — $4,500 · HealthPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING — $530,000 · Public Benefit+1 more — $5,000 · Public BenefitCOMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $150,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC — $120,000 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO HISPANO INC — $60,000 · Human Services+3 more — $31,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$12,286,816Other$9,850,419Civil Rights$1,652,000Environment$1,207,500Health$684,500Public Benefit$535,000Human Services$526,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIMOTHY AND DEBORAH MOORE FAMILY — $5,591,908 over 1y, 62% of budgetRICHARD AND BARBARA MOORE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $5,591,908 over 1y, 61% of budgetPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING — $530,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $450,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $425,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $380,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $360,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER NETWORK — $350,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $350,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $320,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST — $290,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY — $210,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC — $210,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND — $200,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $200,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC — $175,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND — $165,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC — $150,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE PROGRAM INC — $150,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCOTTING SCHOOL INC — $136,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA WHITE PLAINS & CENTRAL WESTCHESTER INC AND ITS AFFILIATES — $135,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHUMAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WESTCHESTER INC — $135,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $128,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $125,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC — $120,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $120,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC — $120,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMEET INTERNATIONAL INC — $120,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $90,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $79,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS — $75,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC — $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC — $70,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetADC RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $70,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetEL CENTRO HISPANO INC — $60,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetRADIO DIARIES INC — $52,500 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $51,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe New School — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIMOTHY AND DEBORAH MOORE FAMILY ↗
  • Who funds RICHARD AND BARBARA MOORE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds COTTING SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA WHITE PLAINS & CENTRAL WESTCHESTER INC AND ITS AFFILIATES ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEET INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Communit…Jewish Communal FundSt Faith's House Foun…Td Charitable Foundat…The Thomas and Agnes …Mbia FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…Impact100 Westchester…Yvonne & Leslie Polla…Field Hall FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…Pcsb Community Founda…
The New York Community TrustNY33.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · St Faith's House Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Mbia Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Impact100 Westchester Inc · Yvonne & Leslie Pollack Family Foundation Inc · Field Hall Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Pcsb Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization David and Katherine Moore Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Victory Programs Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Charles River Watershed Association Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Cotting School Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David and Katherine Moore Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David and Katherine Moore Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines