Skip to content

· Private foundation

David and Julie Hnatek Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$167kReligion$167kInternational$138kRecreation & Sports$120kHousing & Shelter$80kCommunity Improvement$20kArts & Culture$8kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.7M
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,696,864
FAMILIES SET FREE$57,667
HOPE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$15,000
YOUNG LIFE$5,000
HOPE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$1,000
ANTIOCH FORT WORTH$585
Individual grant recipient$500
LLC FOUNDATION$40
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BEATIFUL REDEMPTION: $10k → 9%BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION: $5k → 9%BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
CA
CO
MO
DE
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$497k · 12 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
24

Total granted

$497k
$214k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+8%

Still filing today

33%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentReligionHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    IMPACT CITY FC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $110k · revenue +498%
  • BR
    BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +65%
  • TG
    THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • WG
    With God All Things Are Possible
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
2
Freed Life

Freed Life exists to eradicate human trafficking through empowering survivors, equipping communities and changing systems.

—
3
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
4
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
5
Eden Ministry

Eden Ministry seeks to advocate for trafficked victims in Asia to reach rescue and restore them from exploitation

Religion
6
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
7
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
8
Alive At Last

Alive at Last helps victims of sexual exploitation and trafficking live free and discover their God-given purpose.

Crime & Legal
9
Global Faith Network
Human Services
10
Freed People

Freed People ignites hope by redeeming destinies and restoring families. Our faith leads us to believe there are no hopeless situations, only hopeless feelings Freed People supports organizations that rescue girls from sex trafficking ,…

Human Services
11
Global Commission Partners Inc

Global commission partners is an evangelical missionary not for profit organization dedicated to evaluate and support native ministries who are planting the gospel of jesus christ among unreach people groups in poor countries.

Philanthropy
12
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Families Set Free Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,696,864 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREFUGE FOR WOMEN: $80,000 · Other+27 more: $390,725 · Other+27 moreIMPACT CITY FC: $110,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionPASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · ReligionFAMILIES SET FREE INC: $57,667 · InternationalWith God All Things Are Possible: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $315 · Youth DevelopmentLIVING SOUL FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterBEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $245 · Human ServicesTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,167,589Religion$130,000International$57,667Youth Development$40,315Housing & Shelter$35,000Human Services$20,245Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMPACT CITY FC: $110,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetFAMILIES SET FREE INC: $57,667 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLIVING SOUL FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetWith God All Things Are Possible: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION: $20,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNBOUND NOW: $315 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT: $245 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMPACT CITY FC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES SET FREE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING SOUL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds With God All Things Are Possible ↗
  • Who funds BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds PASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds UNBOUND NOW ↗
  • Who funds THE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA14.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Servant Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David and Julie Hnatek Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David and Julie Hnatek Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David and Julie Hnatek Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph