Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dancing Tides Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
100
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$6.5MEnvironment$4.9MPhilanthropy$4.3MEducation$4.0MHuman Services$874kArts & Culture$844kHealth$694kPublic Benefit$600kOther$0
02FY2024 · 100 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $142k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $893k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.4M
$15,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$1,000,000
ROBIN HOOD$750,000
CRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$400,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$250,000
CATE SCHOOL$200,000
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$200,000
CHARITY WATER$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
AMERICANA MUSIC ASSOC FOUNDATION$60,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$50,000
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$50,000
MATH FOR AMERICA$50,000
DIRECT RELIEF$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD HELP: $1k → 11%CHARITY WATER: $100k → 4%WOMEN IMPACT FUND: $25k → 10%COMPANIONS FOR HEROS: $1k → 14%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $500 → 6%CHILDREN IN CONFLICT: $100k → 4%COMPANIONS FOR HEROS: $1k → 14%CHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC: $25k → 4%STUDENT VETERANS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%CHILDREN IN CONFLICT: $5k → 4%FOUNDATION FOR HARMONY PRESENTS: $5k → 9%CHARITY WATER: $100k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $100k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $100k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $100k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $100k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $100k → 17%SURF HAPPENS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THORN: $20k → 14%SURF HAPPENS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%THORN: $20k → 14%SURF HAPPENS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $25k → 17%SURF HAPPENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SURF HAPPENS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $5k → 14%MONTECITO FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 14%SURF HAPPENS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%MONTECITO FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 14%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $3k → 14%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $3k → 14%CHANNEL ISLANDS YMCA: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 107 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

107 repeat relationships — 70 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

107
82

Total granted

$22M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+7%

Still filing today

68%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $302k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalEducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +81%
  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +49%
  • CC
    CRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • AV
    America Votesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $600k · revenue +495%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
  • VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
8
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
11
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cohen Veterans Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersWomen & Girls Leadership De…Military Veterans SupportLocal History MuseumsYouth Sports ProgramsDance Arts OrganizationsCancer Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr14%7%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr19%28%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%5%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr19%6%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%50%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/142
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,618

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 217 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
135/138
Grantees still filing
91/138
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

International Rescue Committee INC — $5,397,700 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committ…DIRECT RELIEF — $260,000 · InternationalALIADOS USA — $236,300 · International+6 more — $545,000 · International+6 moreTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,450,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient — $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $336,244 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $300,000 · Other+136 more — $5,138,981 · Other+136 moreROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $3,750,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDAT…SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Philanthropy+8 more — $226,000 · Philanthropy+8 moreCRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $1,790,000 · EducationCRANE COUNTRY…MATH FOR AMERICA — $862,814 · EducationMATH FOR AMER…CATE SCHOOL — $300,000 · EducationCATE SCHOOL+10 more — $230,000 · Education+10 moreTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,450,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FO…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $400,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESO…POCONO ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER INC — $165,000 · EnvironmentPOCONO ENVIR…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $140,000 · EnvironmentSANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC — $130,000 · EnvironmentTHE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $100,000 · EnvironmentWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $100,000 · Environment+6 more — $289,500 · Environment+6 moreCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $700,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC — $130,000 · Human ServicesDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Human ServicesTHORN — $40,000 · Human Services+8 more — $111,500 · Human ServicesAmerica Votes — $600,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $7,000 · Community Improvement
International$6,439,000Other$7,725,225Philanthropy$4,176,000Education$3,182,814Environment$2,774,500Human Services$1,081,500Community Improvement$607,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,397,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $3,750,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $1,790,000 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,450,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,450,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMATH FOR AMERICA — $862,814 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $700,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAmerica Votes — $600,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $400,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCATE SCHOOL — $300,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $260,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALIADOS USA — $236,300 over 3y, 75% of budgetSanta Barbara Bucket Brigade — $200,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMONTECITO TRAILS FOUNDATION — $182,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetMercy Corps — $165,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $165,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOCONO ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER INC — $165,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $145,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $142,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $140,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC — $130,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetCHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC — $130,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetWilderness Youth Project Inc — $116,043 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $110,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetINNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $100,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $100,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $99,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $95,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc — $91,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER — $90,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetASPETUCK LAND TRUST — $83,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetSANTA BARBARA BOWL FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND — $80,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST — $65,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $62,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICANA MUSIC FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetHEAL THE OCEAN INC — $55,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetSustainable Conservation — $50,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetParkinsons Wellness Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGoodnation Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds MATH FOR AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds America Votes ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CATE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ALIADOS USA ↗
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Bucket Brigade ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTECITO TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds POCONO ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wilderness Youth Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara Foundat…Hutton Foundation Dba…Ann Jackson Family Fo…The Kirby-Jones Found…Tony and Kyra Rogers …Brittingham Family Fo…Www FoundationThe B & B FoundationMosher FoundationThe Goldman Sachs Cha…James S Bower Foundat…G a Fowler Family Fou…
Santa Barbara FoundationCA59× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · The Kirby-Jones Foundation · Tony and Kyra Rogers Foundation · Brittingham Family Foundation · Www Foundation · The B & B Foundation · Mosher Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · James S Bower Foundation · G a Fowler Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dancing Tides Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
  • Aha Foundation Inc — 42% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Aspetuck Land Trust — 28% of income from government
  • Saga Innovations Inc — 28% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • 47 Palmer Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Cohen Veterans Network Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dancing Tides Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dancing Tides Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 217 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines