How much did DALLAS PI BETA PHI PHILANTHROPIES grant in FY2025?

DALLAS PI BETA PHI PHILANTHROPIES reported 6 grants totaling $218,671 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is DALLAS PI BETA PHI PHILANTHROPIES based?

DALLAS PI BETA PHI PHILANTHROPIES is based in TX.

DALLAS PI BETA PHI PHILANTHROPIES

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

DALLAS PI BETA PHI PHILANTHROPIES

See schedule o the organization's mission is to exclusively support charitable literary, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the irs code.

$219k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$52k

Largest

01What you fund

0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.

Education$339kReligion$115kInternational$95kYouth Development$86kHuman Services$83kPhilanthropy$43kOther$206k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

childrenstudentsfraternityequip

2020

fraternitystudents

2021

westlivesstudentsenablesfraternity

2022

bachman lakechildrenfraternity

2023

readingenglishstudents

2025

advancement literacy

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k4 grants · $105k
$50k–250k2 grants · $102k

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$105k

Total assets

Largest grants

CATCH UP AND READ$51,500
BRIDGEBUILDERS$50,000
CRISTO REY SCHOOL$30,000
WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL$30,000
FOR THE NATIONS REFUGEE OUTREACH$30,000
UNITED TO LEARN$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$778k · 12 repeat orgs$189k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$778k

$189k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%

+6%

Still filing today

100%

89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FT
FOR THE NATIONS REFUGEE OUTREACH
4× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +29%
CU
CATCH UP AND READ
3× · 2019–2025 · $94k · revenue +224%
HB
HIS BRIDGEBUILDERS
3× · 2022–2025 · $93k · revenue +153%

Funded once

VO
VOICE OF HOPE
one grant, 2021 · $22k · revenue -12%
CC
CHILD CARE GROUPgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $22k · revenue +90%
TR
TRINITY RIVER MISSION
one grant, 2019 · $22k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Dallas Christian School

Private christian school education - preschool through high school.

Education

Colleyville Covenant Christian

The Christian education of children ages three through eighteen

Education

Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education

Presbyterian School

Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child.

Education

Yes Prep Public Schools Inc

YES Prep is a public charter school system for grades K-12 in Houston's underserved communities.

Education

Kipp Texas Inc

KIPP Texas Public Schools is an open-enrollment, free public charter school network of 57 schools with nearly 35,000 Pre-K - 12 students across the state. Together with our families and communities, we create joyful, academically excellent…

Education

The Compass School of Texas

We believe in inquiry-based learning and bringing real-world experiences into the classroom to help students draw connections between lessons and how they can impact the world.

Education

Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education

Chartwell School

Chartwell School empowers bright students with language-based learning differences, including dyslexia. We do this in grades K-12 by offering them the knowledge, creativity, and skills in self advocacy and perseverance needed to thrive in…

Education

Timothy Christian Schools

Develop academically prepared Christian disciples who embrace Christ's call to transform the world

—

Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter school system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses (cont'd on sch. o) work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through sutdent…

Education

Bridgeway Foundation for Education Inc

To partner with parents in a jesus-centered community to educate, strengthen and equip the whole child.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jubilee Park & Community Center Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Trinity River Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

16/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$338,550Other$206,475Religion$115,000International$95,000Youth Development$86,000Human Services$83,000Philanthropy$43,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX41× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Capital for Kids · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Elizabeth Toon Charities · Dallas Alumnae Association of Kappa · The Addy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DALLAS PI BETA PHI PHILANTHROPIES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~13 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 8.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814526609 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 13 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Dallas Pi Beta Phi Philanthropies?

Find your warmest path to Dallas Pi Beta Phi Philanthropies through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DALLAS PI BETA PHI PHILANTHROPIES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dallas Pi Beta Phi Philanthropies?

More from the funding graph

DALLAS PI BETA PHI PHILANTHROPIES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dallas Pi Beta Phi Philanthropies?

More from the funding graph