· Private foundation
D and R Charitable Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $757k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $697k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO CHICAGO | $150,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA | $125,000 |
| CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $100,000 |
| LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| CAF AMERICA | $72,450 |
| MUSEUM OF SCIENCE & INDUSTRY | $50,000 |
| DOVETAIL PROJECT | $50,000 |
| TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDEN | $50,000 |
| ERIE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER | $40,000 |
| GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY | $40,000 |
| SONORAN INSTITUTE | $35,000 |
| KIDS ABOVE ALL | $30,000 |
| LINCOLN PARK ZOO | $30,000 |
| POSSE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| CHICAGO HIGH SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
52 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JUJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO3× · 2021–2023 · $475k · revenue +33%
- CSChicago Symphony Orchestra2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +56%
- EFErie Family Health Center Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $150k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $450k
- LCLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGOone grant, 2021 · $125k
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…
The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.
To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.
The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…
We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Theatre Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Immigrant Legal Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
- Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Erie Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds International Neighborhood Collaborative ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO HIGH SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds Kids Above All Illinois ↗
- Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds START EARLY ↗
- Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Erikson Institute ↗
- Who funds TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS ↗
- Who funds Lawrence Hall ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds SARAH'S CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SONORAN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Tucson Symphony Society ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL MINDS ↗
- Who funds North Chicago Community Partners ↗
- Who funds The Amerind Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: D and R Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Park City Community Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Patrick and Anna M Cudahy Fund · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization D and R Charitable Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to D and R Charitable Fund?
Find your warmest path to D and R Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.