How much did CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $15k
$10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$250k+3 grants · $1.7M

$500,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

FIRST PEOPLE WORLDWIDE$712,000
BATANI FOUNDATION$526,700
EARTHWORKS$500,000
NORTON BAY WATERSHED COUNCIL$12,000
EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT$8,000
NVN-NES-A LAND TRUST$7,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.5M · 4 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +135% since the first grant, against +95% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.5M

$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+135%

+95%

Still filing today

75%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEnvironmentInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

II
INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS FUND FOR DEVELOPMENT & SOLIDARITY
4× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +1071%
E
EARTHWORKS
2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +112%
EB
EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT
2× · 2022–2024 · $14k · revenue +135%

Funded once

E
EKVN-YEFOLECVgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +1510%
NV
NATIVE VILLAGE OF AMBER TRADITIONAL COUNCIL
one grant, 2023 · $20k
PO
PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
one grant, 2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

International Indian Treaty Council Inc

The International Indian Treaty Council (IITC) is an organization of Indigenous Peoples working for self-determination and the recognition and protection of human rights, treaties, traditional cultures, and sacred lands and waters.

Civil Rights

Indigenous Peoples Council for

The Council is a coalition of Tribal marine mammal commissions/councils and other Native organizations formed for the purpose of identifying and addressing marine mammal issues of common concern.

Environment

Indigenous Regeneration

Indigenous Regeneration exists to inspire Native Communities on re-generative living concepts, through food cultivation, medicinal farming, culture, and eco-village educational programs, to achieve re-indigenization and true Tribal…

Youth Development

Ojisda Sustainable Indigenous Futures

A world where Indigenous people are seen, heard, healthy and thriving and the earth is respected and cared for. OJI:SDA expands Indigenous visibility, land literacy and good health by using innovative methods of sharing ancestral knowledge.

Human Services

Earth Island Institute Inc

Earth Island Institute (the Organization) was founded in 1982 by legendary environmentalist David R. Brower (1912-2000) to confront the unprecedented threats to life on Earth. The Organization supports environmental initiatives that are…

Environment

Indigenous Women Rising

—

Intertribal Sinkyone Wilderness

—

Native Americans in Philanthropy

Native Americans in Philanthropy advocates, educates, convenes and innovates to dramatically increase philanthropic investments in Native communities and transform the philanthropic sector's relationship with Indigenous communities.

Civil Rights

Indigenous Conservation Council

The ICC is formed on the basis that returning land to Indigenous Peoples who can practice tribal values and strong relationships with the land is one of the best ways to restore and heal landscapes and communities.

Environment

The Cultural ConservancySacred Land

The Cultural Conservancy is a Native-led Indigenous rights organization. Since 1985, we have been dedicated to our mission of protecting & revitalizing Indigenous cultures, empowering them in the direct application of their traditional…

Arts & Culture

Wabanaki Cultural Preservation Coalition

Nibezun resides on sacred Wabanaki land alongside the Penobscot River where we celebrate culture as medicine, provide an inclusive space for healing, and promote sustainability for all people.

Arts & Culture

Se Si Le

Utilize Indigenous ancestral knowledge for the benefit of our Mother Earth, Indigenous lifeways, and for future generations.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mixtecoindigena and the most unlike its peers is International Indigenous Fund for. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/13

Grantees still filing

11/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,520,000International$1,038,900Public Benefit$1,000,000Environment$20,000Arts & Culture$20,000Community Improvement$14,000Animals$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Development InstituteCO17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Seventh Generation Fund · Ndn Collective Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · California Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS FUND FOR DEVELOPMENT & SOLIDARITY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 11.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 831179364 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS FUND FOR DEVELOPMENT & SOLIDARITY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Cultural Survival Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cultural Survival Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cultural Survival Inc?

More from the funding graph

CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cultural Survival Inc?

More from the funding graph