Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crowley Shanahan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$809k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$4.3MEducation$3.2MHuman Services$1.4MInternational$420kHealth$408kHousing & Shelter$50kRecreation & Sports$5kPhilanthropy$500
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $344k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$144,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDEN PROJECT FOUNDATION$400,000
OPERATION RESTORED WARRIOR$200,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$144,000
SAMFORD UNIVERSITY$25,000
CORAM DEO ACADAMY$20,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ADAPTIVE TRAINING FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%OUR CALLING INC: $50k → 14%PARENT COMPASS INC: $30k → 14%PARENT COMPASS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
CA
CO
MO
VA
NC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.8M · 11 repeat orgs$922k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$8.8M
$753k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+48%

Still filing today

64%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $169k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EDEN PROJECT FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.9M · revenue ×12 · 100% of their budget
  • PH
    PATRICK HENRY COLLEGE
    6× · 2018–2023 · $2.5M · revenue +18%
  • CD
    CORAM DEO ACADEMY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $486k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +106%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
  • BF
    BARNABAS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
3
Servant Foundation

The Signatry advances the Christian faith by carrying out its mission, "to inspire and facilitate revolutionary biblical generosity across generations to solve the world's greatest problems," through financial and other support of I.R.C.…

Religion
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Champion Christian College Inc

To develop christ-centered servant leaders through a challenging academic environment in order to impact the world for the kingdom of god.

Education
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
8
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
9
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
12
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ourcalling Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDEN PROJECT FOUNDATION: $2,874,941 · ReligionEDEN PROJECT FOUNDATIONSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $200,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE+1 more: $100,000 · ReligionPATRICK HENRY COLLEGE: $2,483,570 · EducationPATRICK HENRY COLLEGECORAM DEO ACADEMY: $486,000 · EducationCORAM DEO ACADEMY+2 more: $127,400 · EducationOPERATION RESTORED WARRIOR: $850,000 · OtherOPERATION RESTORED WARRIORWATERMARK COMMUNITY CHURCH: $750,000 · OtherWATERMARK COMMUNITY CHURCHOPERATION RESTORED WARRIOR CO NEW HORIZONS: $300,500 · OtherOPERATION RESTORED WARRIOR CO …UNHINDERED INC: $270,000 · OtherUNHINDERED INCAUBURN UNIVERSITY: $144,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $125,000 · Other+5 more: $166,812 · Other+5 moreSave the Storks: $400,000 · HealthMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Health+1 more: $6,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $220,000 · InternationalPOETIC: $50,000 · Human ServicesOURCALLING INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesPARENT COMPASS INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesAdaptive Training Foundation: $5,000 · Human ServicesCARRY THE LOAD: $500 · Philanthropy
Religion$3,174,941Education$3,096,970Other$2,606,312Health$456,000International$220,000Human Services$145,000Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDEN PROJECT FOUNDATION: $2,874,941 over 4y, 100% of budgetPATRICK HENRY COLLEGE: $2,483,570 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetCORAM DEO ACADEMY: $486,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetSave the Storks: $400,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $220,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $102,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPOETIC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOURCALLING INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPARENT COMPASS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSamford University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGE CITY OF DALLAS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetRUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAdaptive Training Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCARRY THE LOAD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDEN PROJECT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PATRICK HENRY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CORAM DEO ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Save the Storks ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds POETIC ↗
  • Who funds MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OURCALLING INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENT COMPASS INC ↗
  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE CITY OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds RUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Adaptive Training Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CARRY THE LOAD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX21.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · United Way Worldwide · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crowley Shanahan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crowley Shanahan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crowley Shanahan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Crowley Shanahan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crowley Shanahan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph