· Private foundation
Cri Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $143k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+10 grants · $8.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE | $3,300,000 |
| NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST (UBS OPTIMUS) | $1,875,000 |
| LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE | $750,000 |
| ALIMA | $500,000 |
| FRIENDS OF SOLIDAFRICA | $500,000 |
| WANDIKWEZA | $350,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $350,000 |
| YOUNG 1OVE FOUNDATION | $320,000 |
| KYANINGA CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE | $285,000 |
| ACTION AGAINST HUNGER | $275,000 |
| PARTNERS IN HEALTH | $220,493 |
| KING FAISAL HOSPITAL | $151,600 |
| TROPICAL HEALTH AND EDUCATION TRUST | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $133,323 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 76% of grant dollars ($16M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 24% that went abroad ($5.0M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 24% of all-years giving ($5.0M)
9 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLwala Community Alliance4× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +310%
- FOFRIENDS OF SOLID AFRICA INC2× · 2022–2024 · $950k · revenue +212% · 85% of their budget
PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION3× · 2020–2024 · $720k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- EIEDESIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $753k · revenue +129%
- FCFIDELITY CHARITABLE (THE RISK POOL FUND)one grant, 2022 · $345k
- NFNETWORK FOR GOOD (THE IHANGANE PROJECT)one grant, 2020 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…
Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition
MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.
Essential impact creates breakthrough solutions to tackle malnutrition and transform food systems in sub-saharan africa. we leverage advances in fermentation to create affordable, accessible, and climate-resilient proteins that can be…
Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…
FINCA ends poverty through sustainable and scalable solutions inspired by the insights and needs of people in the communities where they live and work.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edesia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gould Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds Lwala Community Alliance ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SOLID AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds ALIMA USA INC ↗
- Who funds EDESIA INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Equalize Health Formerly D-Rev ↗
- Who funds YOUNG 1OVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOULD FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEED GLOBAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SPARK MICROGRANTS INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds STRONGMINDS INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHENABLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
- Who funds TIP Global Health ↗
- Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY LEARNERS INC ↗
- Who funds JACARANDA HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Child Relief International Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Mulago Foundation · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · The Iroh Foundation (Fka Ra5 Foundation) · Sall Family Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · Imago Dei Fund · Rippleworks Inc · Gates Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cri Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cri Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Cri Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.