Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

US Global Leadership Campaign

US Global Leadership Campaign (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $687,000 to it, the largest being OAKW FUND ($350,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$3.2M
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$687k
Net assets
$1.1M
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 5%
01What it does

What US Global Leadership Campaign does

Mission

The Campaign brings together broad based influential network of over 500 businesses and non-governmental organizations who share a commitment to advocating for a strong and effective U.S. International Affairs Budget. The Campaign achieves these objectives through education, advocacy, and related program activities.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. National Programs: In conjunction with its diverse membership of businesses and NGOs, the Campaign is working to advocate for a strong and effective U.S. International Affairs Budget. In 2025, the Campaign continuously delivered its message to Capitol Hill and worked to build new bipartisan champions in the U.S. Congress. In addition, the Campaign brought unique voices to Capitol Hill from the military, business, academic, faith and non-profit communities to show the breadth and depth of support for these issues.

    $985,694 spent
    44% of program spending
  2. Public Education: The Campaign's website is a dynamic and up-to-date resource for Campaign members and policymakers to find the latest information and analysis on the U.S. International Affairs Budget. As a complement to the website, the Campaign uses social and digital media platforms to reach its varied and growing constituency. In addition, as a component of its public outreach, the Campaign releases timely Budget Updates on key messages and happenings of the U.S. International Affairs Budget.

    $984,709 spent
    44% of program spending
  3. Field Program: The Campaign is working across the country to build a domestic constituency for foreign assistance and to educate Members of Congress on the support for these issues in their home districts. Throughout the year, the Campaign's state activists met with Members of Congress and their staff in-state, responded to action alerts, and called or wrote their Members of Congress. Many activists also traveled to Washington, DC for the Campaign's annual conference and met with their representative in their national office.

    $269,627 spent
    12% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,240,030.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.6M) Expenses 100 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($416k)2018 Revenue 110 ($1.7M) Expenses 107 ($1.5M) Net assets 151 ($628k)2019 Revenue 119 ($1.9M) Expenses 129 ($1.8M) Net assets 160 ($666k)2020 Revenue 119 ($1.9M) Expenses 117 ($1.7M) Net assets 212 ($883k)2021 Revenue 111 ($1.8M) Expenses 125 ($1.8M) Net assets 206 ($859k)2022 Revenue 108 ($1.7M) Expenses 122 ($1.7M) Net assets 201 ($838k)2023 Revenue 121 ($1.9M) Expenses 136 ($1.9M) Net assets 193 ($803k)2024 Revenue 119 ($1.9M) Expenses 136 ($2.0M) Net assets 179 ($746k)2025 Revenue 199 ($3.2M) Expenses 193 ($2.8M) Net assets 274 ($1.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (199)Expenses (193)Net assets (274)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $1.5M to $2.7M (+77%).

$1.1M
$1.1M
$1.2M
$1.5M
$1.1M
$1.7M
$1.3M
$1.5M
$2.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$155k
’17
$212k
’18
$38k
’19
$218k
’20
−$24k
’21
−$21k
’22
−$35k
’23
−$57k
’24
$394k
’25
11
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed323736333232313129
Joined·+12+6+6+6+7+6+5+1
No longer listed·77977753
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $81k → $45k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'22
'23
'25*
total
$350k
$225k
funders
2
1
1
2
2
2
3

Left out of every figure on this page: $35k from 2 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest American Israel Public Affairs Committee). These are real filings, and they are not money US Global Leadership Campaign raised.

From the IRS filings of US Global Leadership Campaign’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

US Global Leadership Campaign leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund US Global Leadership Campaign.

51%
largest funder
92%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 93% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 92% · 2022 50% · 2023 67% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

92% of US Global Leadership Campaign's grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.

NY
OR
CT
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like US Global Leadership Campaign

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 6%Fundraising 13%

Governance

24
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for US Global Leadership Campaign: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds US Global Leadership Campaign?
US Global Leadership Campaign (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $687,000 to it, the largest being OAKW FUND ($350,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does US Global Leadership Campaign have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $687,000 in grants to US Global Leadership Campaign, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of US Global Leadership Campaign?
OAKW FUND is the largest funder on record, with $350,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like US Global Leadership Campaign find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds US Global Leadership Campaign →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing