How much did CHILD RELIEF INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION grant in FY2019?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of CHILD RELIEF INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2019 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

$10k–50k6 grants · $169k
$50k–250k17 grants · $1.9M
$250k+1 grant · $300k

$96,667

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

MUSO INC$300,000
SPARK MICROGRANTS$200,000
NETWORK FOR GOOD (THE IHANGANE PROJECT)$200,000
EARTHENABLE$160,000
D-REV DESIGN FOR THE OTHER NINETY PERCENT$150,000
STRONG MINDS$150,000
THE FISTULA FOUNDATION$150,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$125,000
WATSI INC$100,000
LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$100,000
ASPEN INSTITUTE$100,000
GARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONAL$96,667
PIVOT$75,000
SEED GLOBAL HEALTH$75,000
SHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES$62,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 8%. 72% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.5M · 20 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.5M

$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%

Still filing today

65%

35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $361k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHealthEducationPhilanthropySocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MI
MUSO INC
3× · 2017–2019 · $1.2M · revenue +209%
SG
SEED GLOBAL HEALTH
3× · 2017–2019 · $550k · revenue +114%
SM
SPARK MICROGRANTS
3× · 2017–2019 · $450k · revenue +280%

Funded once

TD
THE DRAPER RICHARDS FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $259k
HT
HOPE THROUGH HEALTH
one grant, 2017 · $230k
P
PATH
one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sage Bionetworks

Sage Bionetworks is on a mission to drive a new age of discovery through truly open science and radical collaboration. We aim to create a world where silos within and across science and technology no longer exist, forging a path to optimal…

Science & Tech

Pathfinder International

Pathfinder builds lasting and trusted local partnerships to strengthen health systems, forging resilient pathways to sexual and reproductive health and rights for all.

International

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.

Health

Global Health Council

Global health council is the leading membership organization supporting and connecting advocates, implementers, and stakeholders around global health priorities worldwide. the global health council, inc. (the "council"ghc") was…

International

Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International

A people-centered approach to the conservation of gorillas and their habitats in Africa

—

Global Healing

Global Healing promotes health care reform in areas of the world where modern medical health care is not available. Global Healing aims for sustainable development of healthcare services, rather than short-term or emergency interventions.

International

MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities.

Health

Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care.

Community Improvement

International Aids Vaccine

Translate scientific discoveries into affordable, globally accessible public health solutions

International

Global Impact Investing Network Inc

Increase the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet.

Philanthropy

The California Medical Innovations

Bringing together physical and life science researchers, clinicians, engineers/ and computational scientists to address the significant health care challenges of heart and vascular disease, obesity, and metabolic disorders through a…

Education

Handicap International

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 1000 Days and the most unlike its peers is Williams College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

13/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,561,406International$2,521,000Health$881,000Education$730,000Social Science$300,000Philanthropy$20,778

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mulago FoundationNY22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mulago Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rippleworks Inc · The Iroh Foundation · Sall Family Foundation · Gates Foundation · Cri Foundation Inc · Godley Family Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Dovetail Impact Foundation · The Skoll Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CHILD RELIEF INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONAL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~16 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 161772171 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONAL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 16 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Child Relief International Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Child Relief International Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CHILD RELIEF INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Child Relief International Foundation?

More from the funding graph

CHILD RELIEF INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Child Relief International Foundation?

More from the funding graph