How much did COREWELL HEALTH grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 89% of COREWELL HEALTH’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2022

businessesafrican americanssoutheastmwfeconomylong-termwomen

2023

detroitcanceradvancereceivegovernmentsurgeonsethical

2024

mentalhousingwellnessstudentsaffordableessentialculturally

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $27k
$10k–50k17 grants · $462k
$50k–250k8 grants · $852k
$250k+1 grant · $3.2M

$36,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.1B

Total assets

Largest grants

GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$3,205,030
GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS$179,821
MENTAL HEALTH CLINICIANS OF COLOR IN GRAND RAPIDS$163,203
HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN$145,213
INFORUM$84,000
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN - TRI CITIES MICHIGAN$82,561
STRATEGIC WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS$75,000
EXALTA HEALTH$62,500
COMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS$60,000
URBAN CORE COLLECTIVE$45,000
REALISM IS LOYALTY$45,000
FITKIDS360$40,342
WEST MICHIGAN CTR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY$39,000
DWELLING PLACE OF GRAND RAPIDS$38,500
PUERTAS ABIERTAS INC$36,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$20M · 10 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$20M

$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%

+98%

Still filing today

90%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HC
HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN
3× · 2022–2024 · $175k · revenue +165%
SG
STEM GREENHOUSE
2× · 2022–2023 · $120k · revenue +366%
YM
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN - TRI CITIES MICHIGAN
2× · 2022–2024 · $91k · revenue +176%

Funded once

DR
DETROIT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $750k · revenue +98%
RO
ROYAL OAK CIVIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $83k · revenue +124% · 47% of their budget
CO
CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS
one grant, 2023 · $36k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—

Michigan Health & Hospital Association

To promote the interests of the health care industry.

—

Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—

Michigan Roundtable for Just Communities

Michigan roundtable for just communities is a racial and social justice organization whose purpose is eradicate racism, discrimination, and systemic inequities by cultivating multigenerational just and beloved communities.

Religion

Michigan Pharmacists Association

To represent the pharmacy profession for advancing public health and patient care in mi.

—

Center for Family Health

The mission of the center for family health is opening the door to health care for all.

Health

Michigan Voices

The organization seeks to build civic engagement capacity in progressive nonprofit groups .

Civil Rights

Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promote economic growth in the city of detroit

—

Prevention Michigan

Cultivate healthy communities across michigan through resourses, technical assistance, and support.

Civil Rights

Michigan Chamber Foundation

1) to plan and conduct nonpartisan public education programs regarding free enterprise, productivity and basic economic issues affecting the state of michigan.2) to establish and operate a leadership institute designed to provide promising…

Arts & Culture

Impact100 Detroit

Impact100 Metro Detroit is working to be a leader in collective philanthropy and to build a strong presence in metro Detroit which includes specifically the counties of Macomb, Oakland and Wayne. The members are a group of women who want…

Human Services

Connect Detroit

To strategically solve problems through collaboratives with City of Detroit Departments, nonprofit organizations and local grant makers in order to secure the maximum federal, state, and national foundation dollars for

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic Center of Western Michigan Inc and the most unlike its peers is Calvin University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/67

the rest of the field

14%

2,903/21,386

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

60/60

Grantees still filing

52/60

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$20,181,801Community Improvement$997,623Health$440,874Human Services$398,880Education$317,500Food & Nutrition$160,000Employment$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Corewell Health Group ReturnMI54.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Corewell Health Group Return · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · WK Kellogg Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Frey Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast · Trinity Health - Michigan · The Community Foundation of The · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Mercantile Bank Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation COREWELL HEALTH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MENTAL HEALTH CLINICIANS OF COLOR IN GRAND RAPIDS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 852787460 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MENTAL HEALTH CLINICIANS OF COLOR IN GRAND RAPIDS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 80% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Corewell Health?

Find your warmest path to Corewell Health through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

COREWELL HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Corewell Health?

More from the funding graph

COREWELL HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Corewell Health?

More from the funding graph