Skip to content

· Public charity

Corewell Health

To improve health, instill humanity and inspire hope.

$4.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$3.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$20MCommunity Improvement$913kHealth$544kHuman Services$425kFood & Nutrition$173kEmployment$159kArts & Culture$115kPhilanthropy$93kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 30 grants below total $4,546,255, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,700,220 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $153,965 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $462k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $852k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.2M
$36,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$3,205,030
GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS$179,821
MENTAL HEALTH CLINICIANS OF COLOR IN GRAND RAPIDS$163,203
HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN$145,213
INFORUM$84,000
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN - TRI CITIES MICHIGAN$82,561
STRATEGIC WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS$75,000
EXALTA HEALTH$62,500
COMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS$60,000
URBAN CORE COLLECTIVE$45,000
REALISM IS LOYALTY$45,000
FITKIDS360$40,342
WEST MICHIGAN CTR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY$39,000
DWELLING PLACE OF GRAND RAPIDS$38,500
PUERTAS ABIERTAS INC$36,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEAHS PANTRY INC: $6k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN - TRI CITIES MICHIGAN: $83k → 8%HELPING HANDS: $7k → 15%NEW HEIGHTS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 15%FIRST STEP THE WESTERN WAYNE COUNTY PROJECT DOMESTIC ASSAULT: $10k → 21%REALISM IS LOYALTY: $45k → 11%FITKIDS360: $40k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $145k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $15k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MI: $15k → 11%YMCA: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 10 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
33

Total granted

$20M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+9%

Still filing today

90%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $175k · revenue +85%
  • SG
    STEM GREENHOUSE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $120k · revenue +120%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN - TRI-CITIES MICHIGAN
    2× · 2022–2024 · $91k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • DR
    DETROIT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $750k · revenue +20%
  • RO
    ROYAL OAK CIVIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $83k · revenue +69% · 47% of their budget
  • CH
    COREWELL HEALTH
    one grant, 2017 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Family Health

The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.

Health
2
Detroit Community Health Connection

Dchc is a primary care organization committed to providing accessible, affordable and quality service to all members of the communities we serve.

—
3
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
4
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

—
5
Health Net of West Michigan

To improve the health of children and adults, particularly vulnerable populations, through education and connections to health care and support services.

Health
6
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
7
Michigan Primary Care Association

To ensure the delivery of excellent care that advances health outcomes.

Health
8
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
9
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
10
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

—
11
Great Lakes Bay Health Centers

To provide high quality health care to individuals and community groups in Saginaw, Bay, and other nearby counties. Services are provided without regard to race, beliefs or ability to pay.

Health
12
Family Medical Center of

Family Medical Center of Michigan, Inc. is dedicated to quality and excellence in providing comprehensive, cost-effective primary and preventive health care regardless of age, ethnic background, or ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Michigan Women's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ama International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/60
Grantees still filing
34/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $19,617,530 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY+25 more: $610,104 · OtherDETROIT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $750,000 · Community ImprovementROYAL OAK CIVIC FOUNDATION: $82,623 · Community ImprovementURBAN CORE COLLECTIVE: $45,000 · Community Improvement+7 more: $120,000 · Community ImprovementOur Mental Health Collective: $163,203 · HealthHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES: $62,500 · HealthAFRICAN-AMERICAN HEALTH INSTITUTE: $35,000 · HealthNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $33,292 · HealthCATHERINES HEALTH CENTER: $30,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · HealthNORTHERN MICHIGAN HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $20,000 · Health+6 more: $51,879 · HealthHISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $175,213 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN - TRI-CITIES MICHIGAN: $90,561 · Human ServicesREALISM IS LOYALTY: $45,000 · Human ServicesFitKids360: $40,342 · Human ServicesHOAP INC: $15,000 · Human Services+4 more: $32,764 · Human ServicesSTEM GREENHOUSE INC: $120,000 · EducationWEST MICHIGAN CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY: $89,000 · EducationINFORUM: $84,000 · EducationLiteracy Center of West Michigan: $17,500 · Education+1 more: $7,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS: $90,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $70,000 · Food & NutritionSTRATEGIC WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS: $75,000 · Employment
Other$20,227,634Community Improvement$997,623Health$440,874Human Services$398,880Education$317,500Food & Nutrition$160,000Employment$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDETROIT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $750,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetHISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $175,213 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetOur Mental Health Collective: $163,203 over 1y, 80% of budgetSTEM GREENHOUSE INC: $120,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN - TRI-CITIES MICHIGAN: $90,561 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS: $90,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWEST MICHIGAN CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY: $89,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetINFORUM: $84,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetROYAL OAK CIVIC FOUNDATION: $82,623 over 1y, 47% of budgetSTRATEGIC WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS: $75,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES: $62,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetURBAN CORE COLLECTIVE: $45,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetREALISM IS LOYALTY: $45,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetFitKids360: $40,342 over 1y, 15% of budgetDWELLING PLACE OF GRAND RAPIDS NONPROFIT: $38,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPuertas Abiertas Inc: $36,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetAFRICAN-AMERICAN HEALTH INSTITUTE: $35,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $33,292 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHERINES HEALTH CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetA Glimpse of Africa: $29,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $22,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY OUTREACH CENTER: $22,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAKESHORE ETHNIC DIVERSITY ALLIANCE: $21,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetSOCIETY OF BLACK ACADEMIC SURGEONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN MICHIGAN HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGrand Rapids Area Chamber of Commerce: $18,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLiteracy Center of West Michigan: $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCherry Street Services Foundation: $17,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHOAP INC: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE RIGHT PLACE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEST MICHIGAN HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMid-Michigan District Health Dept: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEEN STREET SKILLS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNATIONAL FORUM FOR BLACK PUBLIC ADMINISTRATORS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFirst Step The Western Wayne County Project Domestic Assault: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HEIGHTS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPM: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetASSOC OF FUNDRAISING PROF GREATER DETROIT CHAPTER: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE MICHIGAN WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDETROIT CHILDREN'S FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Corewell Health Group ReturnMI53.2× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Corewell Health Group Return · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Frey Foundation · The Wege Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Steelcase Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Trinity Health - Michigan

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Corewell Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Corewell Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Corewell Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph