Skip to content
Core Community Organized Relief Effort at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Core Community Organized Relief Effort

We are a crisis response organization that brings immediate aid and recovery to underserved communities across the globe.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$408k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$4.9MInternational$672kArts & Culture$605kEnvironment$275kHuman Services$214kEmployment$172kYouth Development$83kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $478,785, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,119,329 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,640,544 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $408k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER$407,999
WAYUU TAYA FOUNDATION INC$50,000
WEST VALLEY COUNSELING CENTER$20,786
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $257k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO FIRST BORN: $10k → 32%HAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC: $23k → 15%CHRIS 180 INC: $72k → 14%HARAMBEE HOUSE: $21k → 16%CHRIS 180 INC: $72k → 14%CHRIS180: $38k → 14%MEND HEALTH: $5k → 14%SERVICE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIFE: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
CA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $12M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $11M to organizations and $213k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Ukraine$8.0M · 69% · 43 grants · 10 people

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RESPONSE, WASH, SMALL AND MEDIUM REPAIRS, RESTORATION, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, URBAN RENEWAL, EDUCATION · SUPPORT TO REFUGEE AND SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS IN UKRAINE

Haiti$2.8M · 24% · 35 grants

Stated purpose: REFORESTATION, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, URBAN RENEWAL

Romania$361k · 3% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT TO REFUGEE AND SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS IN UKRAINE

Poland$229k · 2% · 8 grants · 2 people

Stated purpose: SUPPORT TO REFUGEE AND SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS IN UKRAINE

Sudan$183k · 2% · 2 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RESPONSE · SUPPORT TO REFUGEE AND SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS IN UKRAINE

Brazil$15k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RESPONSE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 10 repeat orgs$4.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$2.3M
$4.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+29%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NATIONAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $561k · revenue +66% · 28% of their budget
  • HC
    HERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER
    3× · 2021–2024 · $483k · revenue +58%
  • WT
    WAYUU TAYA FOUNDATIONINC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $353k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3.0M · revenue +42%
  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $547k
  • RC
    ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $491k · revenue +172%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
2
California Black Health Network

The Organization advocates for health equity by leading and facilitating convenings in all regions of California for the purpose of providing policy analysis, research and training that promotes best practices, which supports the creation…

—
3
North County Health Project Inc

TrueCare's mission is to improve the health status of our diverse communities by providing quality health care that is comprehensive, affordable and culturally sensitive. In 2024, TrueCare provided 367,941 visits, serving 68,023 patients.

—
4
African Com Public Health Coalition

To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.

Health
5
Light From Light Inc

Light from light partners with local leaders to provide healthcare and nutrition for the most vulnerable communities in haiti. our vision is that no child ever dies from malnutrition. our three program focus areas are: 1) nutrition…

International
6
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
7
All Inclusive Community Health Cent

The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.

Health
8
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
9
Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health
10
Center for African American Health

The Center works to address health disparities in the underserved African American community by offering culturally competent behavioral and physical health education and outreach that empowers community members to overcome the root causes…

Community Improvement
11
Thrive Networks Global

Thrive Networks' expertise is built on over 30 years of experience of designing, testing, and implementing cutting-edge, evidence-based programs in water supply, sanitation and hygiene WASH, economic empowerment, gender equity, healthy…

International
12
Neighbors' Consejo

Provider of culturally and linguistically free mental healthcare and social support services to residents of washington, dc., within the mental health rehabilitative services (mhrs) program of the department of behavioral health.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whitman-Walker Health System Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Adolescent Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,000,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY+1 more: $6,000 · EducationROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $490,520 · HealthROOTS COMMUNITY HEALT…HERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $483,131 · HealthHERALD CHRISTIAN HEAL…WHITMAN-WALKER HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $231,686 · HealthWHITMAN-WALKER HEALTH…504HEALTHNET INC: $91,184 · Health504HEALTHNET INC+2 more: $46,650 · HealthWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $546,774 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSIT…HAITI TAKES ROOT: $275,000 · OtherHAITI TAKES ROOTWORLD CONCERN DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $204,620 · OtherWORLD CONCERN DEVELOP…CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER: $56,080 · OtherGlobal Adolescent Project Inc: $55,000 · OtherWAYUU TAYA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT RESPONSE ORGANIZATION INC: $50,000 · OtherABARA INC: $45,200 · Other+3 more: $28,807 · OtherNATIONAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK INC: $561,339 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL …NATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $44,000 · Arts & CultureNATIVE RE…WAYUU TAYA FOUNDATIONINC: $352,500 · InternationalCHRIS 180 INC: $182,832 · Human ServicesHAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesHarambee House Inc: $21,198 · Human ServicesService Center for Independent Life: $15,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST NEW MEXICO FIRST BORN PROGRAM: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesEAST LOS ANGELES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $83,236 · Youth Development
Education$3,006,000Health$1,343,171Other$1,311,481Arts & Culture$605,339International$352,500Human Services$256,530Youth Development$83,236

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK INC: $561,339 over 2y, 28% of budgetROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $490,520 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $483,131 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWAYUU TAYA FOUNDATIONINC: $352,500 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetWHITMAN-WALKER HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $231,686 over 2y, 23% of budgetWORLD CONCERN DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $204,620 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetCHRIS 180 INC: $182,832 over 3y, 0.2% of budget504HEALTHNET INC: $91,184 over 2y, 18% of budgetEAST LOS ANGELES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $83,236 over 2y, 22% of budgetCHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER: $56,080 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetABARA INC: $45,200 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetNATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $44,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS CBWW INC: $25,864 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHarambee House Inc: $21,198 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWest Valley Counseling Center A Non-Profit Organization: $20,786 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetService Center for Independent Life: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST NEW MEXICO FIRST BORN PROGRAM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLos Angeles Metropolitan Churches: $8,807 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCalifornia Community …Tides FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Direct ReliefCA14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · California Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Core Community Organized Relief Effort funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Core Community Organized Relief Effort. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Core Community Organized Relief Effort’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home