How much did CORCORAN JAYCEES grant in FY2024?

Human Services$525kFood & Nutrition$93kPhilanthropy$57kCommunity Improvement$28kEducation$27kRecreation & Sports$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kHealth$18kArts & Culture$16kOther$395k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

veteranssacrificepayoff lunchlunch balancesyouthpark

2020

payoff lunchlunch balances

2021

emergencyisd

2022

girls hockeyproductionstheatergreater maplegrove beyondbloomingtonhockey players

2023

financialcancer diagnosiscarenorth brancheducationlivesref

2024

toys christmasless fortunatefortunate childrenemergency

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $20k
$10k–50k2 grants · $53k

$7,250

Median grant

States reached

$691k

Total assets

Largest grants

CORCORAN COMMUNITY FUND$40,250
TOYS FOR TOTS$13,000
ROCKET BOOSTERS$7,250
CITY OF CORCORAN$6,770
WHIZ BANG DAYS INC$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $525k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$972k · 14 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +86% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$972k

$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%

+86%

Still filing today

64%

65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CC
CORCORAN COMMUNITY FUND
5× · 2019–2024 · $502k · revenue +48% · 51% of their budget
SH
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
3× · 2019–2023 · $93k · revenue +102%
MG
MAPLE GROVE WOMEN OF TODAY
2× · 2022–2023 · $28k · revenue +57%

Funded once

CO
CITY OF HANOVER
one grant, 2021 · $24k
CO
CITY OF ROBBINSDALE
one grant, 2022 · $18k
LF
LIVIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue +216%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Run Minnesota

To serve the running community and support runners of all ages and abilities through education, programs, and advocacy. specifically, by developing educational resources and training programs that support and empower runners, facilitating…

Youth Development

Minnetonka High School Girls Hockey

To promote girls hockey in minnetonka schools and community. to encourage highest standards of behavior, fair play and sportsmanship for all involved in girls hockey. in addition to raise funds through donations and selected activities and…

Recreation & Sports

Mankato Area Foundation

To be a trusted resource that connects donors with causes they care about.

—

Rockford Park District Foundation

To provide philanthropic support to the rockford park district

Environment

Mahtomedi Fastpitch Association

Organize and run girls softball teams for 120+ girls in grades K-12 in the Mahtomedi community.

Unclassified

Bloomington Rotary Club Foundation

Supports charitable organizations in bloomington, minnesota and surrounding area. focus is on youth, education and basic needs of individuals.

Unclassified

Northfield Rescue Squad Association

The northfield rescue squad provides the northfield, minnesota area with medical and rescue services. the rescue squad is staffed with all volunteers and responds to approximately 200-300 calls annually. in addition to providing rescue and…

Public Safety & Disaster

The Minnesota Fastbreak Foundation

To elevate lives in the communities where we live, work and play.

Human Services

Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association

Youth hockey association

Arts & Culture

Rose Giving Inc

ROSE stands for Reach Out * Serve * EmpowerWe are a group of highly motivated, caring, TPC Twin Cities women members who share a commitment to make a difference in our community. We organize and host public fundraisers to benefit local…

Philanthropy

Minnewaska Laker Foundation

To support, aid, promote, enhance and improve the activities programs (including athletics, fine arts, music and academic activities) of the Minnewaska Area School District # 2149 in Pope County, Minnesota. To enhance and secure student…

Education

Minnechaug Booster Club

To fundraise in order to provide a safe turf field for the minnechaug high school field

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockford Education Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Thumbs Up Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/37

the rest of the field

14%

1,459/10,776

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/24

Grantees still filing

24/24

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$524,750Other$447,480Food & Nutrition$93,000Philanthropy$57,150Community Improvement$27,570Education$26,500Recreation & Sports$24,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN19.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CORCORAN JAYCEES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CORCORAN COMMUNITY FUND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 832989224 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CORCORAN COMMUNITY FUND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 51% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Corcoran Jaycees?

Find your warmest path to Corcoran Jaycees through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CORCORAN JAYCEES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Corcoran Jaycees?

More from the funding graph

CORCORAN JAYCEES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Corcoran Jaycees?

More from the funding graph