Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$3.8MReligion$670kHealth$423kPhilanthropy$257kFood & Nutrition$84kScience & Tech$54kHuman Services$46kArts & Culture$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Living and Giving in Christ DIOCESE OF CHEYENNE$50,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$25,000
Diocese of Phoenix$20,000
OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAINS CHURCH$19,000
OUR LADY OF JOY$18,500
The Society of St Vincent De Paul$15,000
St Peter's College Foundation Trust$10,000
Academy of Notre Dame$10,000
Make All Children Smile$5,000
THE BRIDGE TO LIFE$5,000
Foothills Food Bank$5,000
Foothills Caring Corps$5,000
D&H Canal Historical Society$5,000
Matanho Project$5,000
CAN DO MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 61% of grant dollars ($3.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 39% that went abroad ($2.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SNACK & Friends: $6k → 17%Bella House: $5k → 5%Green Beret Foundation: $3k → 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%Mile High Ministries: $5k → 12%Green Beret Foundation: $2k → 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
WY
IA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TX
FL

Beyond the US — 39% of all-years giving ($2.1M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Philippines$2.0M · 6 grants
New Zealand$130k · 9 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 27% of CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 11% of the giving stays in WY; read by stated purpose it is 5% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 39% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.0M · 33 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
30

Total granted

$5.0M
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+20%

Still filing today

58%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UN
    US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +41%
  • CU
    Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa
    3× · 2017–2019 · $425k · revenue +10%
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • WC
    WOMEN'S CIRCLE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -82%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • AO
    ACADEMY OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
Wilmington University Inc

Wilmington university is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of the curriculum, and individual attention to students. as an institution with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity for higher…

Education
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Thomas Jefferson School of Law

The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…

Education
9
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
10
Trustees of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens

The broad mission of the ASCSA has remained constant over its distinguished history: teaching research archaeological exploration publication and dissemination of research. Founded in 1881 the ASCSA provides graduate students and scholars…

Arts & Culture
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole and the most unlike its peers is Laurel Grove Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceSenior Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesEducation Equity LeadershipDomestic Violence Crisis Se…At-Risk Youth MentoringChild and Family ServicesCommunity Health CentersProfessional Ballet Compani…Animal Rescue and AdoptionPregnancy Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%63%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,518

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
29/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OUR LADY OF PEACE MISSION SCHOOL INC — $2,000,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PEACE MISSION SCHOOL INCLiving and Giving in Christ DIOCESE OF CHEYENNE — $210,000 · OtherLiving and Giving in Christ DIOCESE OF CHEYENNEMD Anderson Cancer Center — $200,000 · OtherMD Anderson Cancer CenterCan Do Multiple Sclerosis — $115,005 · Other+41 more — $874,800 · Other+41 moreUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 · EducationUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INCClarke University of Dubuque Iowa — $425,000 · EducationClarke University of Dubuque Io…+7 more — $110,500 · Education+7 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $225,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC — $96,500 · Health+4 more — $6,450 · HealthDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $50,000 · ReligionWOMEN'S CIRCLE INC — $25,000 · ReligionFoothills Caring Corps Inc — $27,295 · Human ServicesGREEN BERET FOUNDATION — $11,500 · Human ServicesSNACK & FRIENDS INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesMILE HIGH MINISTRIES — $5,000 · Human ServicesBella House Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesCONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE — $39,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated — $10,000 · International
Other$3,399,805Education$1,535,500Philanthropy$225,500Health$102,950Religion$75,000Human Services$54,795International$49,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetClarke University of Dubuque Iowa — $425,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $225,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCan Do Multiple Sclerosis — $115,005 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC — $96,500 over 9y, 9.3% of budgetTHE NAVAL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $54,300 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILMINGTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $47,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE — $39,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetWHIDBEY ISLAND WALDORF SCHOOL — $32,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFoothills Food Bank — $32,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetD&H CANAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $27,500 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetFoothills Caring Corps Inc — $27,295 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetWOMEN'S CIRCLE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Scranton — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWheaton College — $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION — $11,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMATANHO PROJECT — $10,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSNACK & FRIENDS INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSunday Breakfast Mission — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLaurel Grove Cemetery Association — $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMILE HIGH MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHorse Power for Life — $5,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetEpiscopal Academy — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD — $4,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRyerss Farm for Aged Equines — $3,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNAVAL SUBMARINE LEAGUE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTailhook Educational Foundation Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEDWIG HOUSE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChester County Historical Society — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JOSEPH'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCave Creek Museum — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation — $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE
  • Who funds Can Do Multiple Sclerosis
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC
  • Who funds THE NAVAL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
  • Who funds WILMINGTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
  • Who funds CONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE
  • Who funds WHIDBEY ISLAND WALDORF SCHOOL
  • Who funds Foothills Food Bank
  • Who funds D&H CANAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Foothills Caring Corps Inc
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CIRCLE INC
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds University of Scranton
  • Who funds Wheaton College
  • Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds MATANHO PROJECT
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SNACK & FRIENDS INC
  • Who funds Sunday Breakfast Mission
  • Who funds Laurel Grove Cemetery Association

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Financial Foundation IncPA11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Verizon Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wilmington Christian School Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION?

Find your warmest path to CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph