Skip to content

· Private foundation

CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.8MReligion$670kHealth$423kPhilanthropy$257kFood & Nutrition$84kScience & Tech$54kHuman Services$46kArts & Culture$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Living and Giving in Christ DIOCESE OF CHEYENNE$50,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$25,000
Diocese of Phoenix$20,000
OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAINS CHURCH$19,000
OUR LADY OF JOY$18,500
The Society of St Vincent De Paul$15,000
St Peter's College Foundation Trust$10,000
Academy of Notre Dame$10,000
Matanho Project$5,000
THE BRIDGE TO LIFE$5,000
CAN DO MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS$5,000
Bella House$5,000
Make All Children Smile$5,000
Foothills Food Bank$5,000
Northwest Harvest$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 61% of grant dollars ($3.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 39% that went abroad ($2.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SNACK & Friends: $6k → 17%Bella House: $5k → 5%Green Beret Foundation: $3k → 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%Mile High Ministries: $5k → 12%Green Beret Foundation: $2k → 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $5k → 11%Foothills Caring Corps: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
WY
IA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 39% of all-years giving ($2.1M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Philippines$2.0M · 6 grants
New Zealand$130k · 9 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 11% of the giving stays in WY; by stated purpose, 5%.

CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 39% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 33 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
30

Total granted

$5.0M
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+16%

Still filing today

58%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UN
    US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +41%
  • CU
    Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa
    3× · 2017–2019 · $425k · revenue +10%
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • WC
    WOMEN'S CIRCLE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -82%
  • TC
    THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -23%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Wilmington University Inc

Wilmington university is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of the curriculum, and individual attention to students. as an institution with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity for higher…

Education
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Thomas Jefferson School of Law

The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…

Education
9
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
10
Trustees of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens

The broad mission of the ASCSA has remained constant over its distinguished history: teaching research archaeological exploration publication and dissemination of research. Founded in 1881 the ASCSA provides graduate students and scholars…

Arts & Culture
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole; the most unlike its peers is Laurel Grove Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
28/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR LADY OF PEACE MISSION SCHOOL INC: $2,000,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PEACE MISSION SCHOOL INCLiving and Giving in Christ DIOCESE OF CHEYENNE: $210,000 · OtherLiving and Giving in Christ DIOCESE OF CHEYENNEMD Anderson Cancer Center: $200,000 · OtherMD Anderson Cancer CenterCan Do Multiple Sclerosis: $115,005 · Other+41 more: $874,800 · Other+41 moreUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · EducationUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INCClarke University of Dubuque Iowa: $425,000 · EducationClarke University of Dubuque Io…+7 more: $110,500 · Education+7 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $225,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC: $96,500 · Health+4 more: $6,450 · HealthDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $50,000 · ReligionWOMEN'S CIRCLE INC: $25,000 · ReligionFoothills Caring Corps Inc: $27,295 · Human ServicesGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $11,500 · Human ServicesSNACK & FRIENDS INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesBella House Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesMILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $5,000 · Human ServicesCONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE: $39,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $10,000 · International
Other$3,399,805Education$1,535,500Philanthropy$225,500Health$102,950Religion$75,000Human Services$54,795International$49,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetClarke University of Dubuque Iowa: $425,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $225,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCan Do Multiple Sclerosis: $115,005 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC: $96,500 over 9y, 9.3% of budgetTHE NAVAL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $54,300 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILMINGTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $47,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE: $39,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetWHIDBEY ISLAND WALDORF SCHOOL: $32,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFoothills Food Bank: $32,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetD&H CANAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $27,500 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetFoothills Caring Corps Inc: $27,295 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetWOMEN'S CIRCLE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Scranton: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWheaton College: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATANHO PROJECT: $10,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetSNACK & FRIENDS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLaurel Grove Cemetery Association: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetEpiscopal Academy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSunday Breakfast Mission: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHorse Power for Life: $5,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetWEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD: $4,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRyerss Farm for Aged Equines: $3,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTailhook Educational Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAVAL SUBMARINE LEAGUE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEDWIG HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChester County Historical Society: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCave Creek Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
  • Who funds Can Do Multiple Sclerosis ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NAVAL INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds WILMINGTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds CONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds WHIDBEY ISLAND WALDORF SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds D&H CANAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Caring Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Scranton ↗
  • Who funds Wheaton College ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MATANHO PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SNACK & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Laurel Grove Cemetery Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Financial Foundation IncPA11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Verizon Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wilmington Christian School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION?

Find your warmest path to CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL FOUNDATION through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on CORBIN A & DORICE S McNEILL’s filings →

More from the funding graph