· Public charity
Community Partnership for Children Inc
The mission of community partnership for children is to design, implement, and manage a quality child protection system for the citizens of volusia, flagler and putnam counties.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k6 grants · $161k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+20 grants · $18M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DEVEREUX FOUNDATION INC | $2,789,338 |
| NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC | $2,554,940 |
| FLORIDA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC DBA RESIDING HOPE | $2,195,797 |
| THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA | $1,851,768 |
| ONE HOPE UNITED | $1,174,263 |
| UNITY HOUSE | $1,095,288 |
| BAY AREA YOUTH SERVICES | $1,092,684 |
| TWIN OAKS JUVENILE DEVELOPMENT INC | $807,090 |
| CHOICES HOUSE INC | $724,440 |
| ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC | $629,032 |
| THE HOUSE NEXT DOOR | $566,598 |
| NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM (NYAP) | $420,120 |
| REYNA GROUP HOME | $356,625 |
| BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES | $333,241 |
| ONE MORE CHILD | $320,387 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $49.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TDThe Devereux Foundation8× · 2018–2025 · $16M · revenue +9%
- FUFLORIDA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC8× · 2018–2025 · $10M · revenue +132%
- BABAY AREA YOUTH SERVICES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +52%
Funded once
- URUSF RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2018 · $522k · revenue +8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing home, hope and healing to abused and neglected children and teens in southwest florida.
Jones Alternative provides Therapeutic Residential Group Home services to female victims ofsexual trauma, including molestation, rape, incest, and human trafficking, who are underthe care of the Florida Department of Children and Families…
The mission of YCC is to build a healthier community by empowering young people and families to rise above adversity.
Preventing child abuse, restoring healing, and strengthening all children and their families through advocacy, treatment, and shelter.
To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…
Pathways' mission is: transforming lives, families and communities.
Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.
Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…
To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.
The organization is dedicated to providing a full range of services to help eliminate child abuse and neglect. the organization strives to build healthy families through prevention, intervention, treatment and education about alternatives…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc and the most unlike its peers is Redemption Home 1 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Devereux Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Choices House Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN OAKS JUVENILE DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds One Hope United ↗
- Who funds THE HEALTHY START COALITION OF FLAGLER AND VOLUSIA COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds ST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds USF RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES HOPE PHOENIX COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds VISION MINISTRIES OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Place at Home Safe Inc ↗
- Who funds CARLTON MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds Boys Town North Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds DANIEL MEMORIAL INC ↗
- Who funds Redemption Home 1 Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Camelot Community Care Inc · Community Based Care of Brevard Inc · Childnet Inc · Lakeview Center Inc · Lutheran Services Florida Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Partnership for Strong Families Inc · Big Bend Community Based Care Inc · Tickets for Kids Foundation · United Way of Volusia-Flagler Counties Inc · Southeast Florida Behavioral Health Network Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Partnership for Children Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc — 12% of income from government
- Meridian Behavioral Healthcare Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- The House Next Door Inc — 4% of income from government
- Hibiscus Children's Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Crossroads Hope Academy Inc — 1% of income from government
- Twin Oaks Juvenile Development Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Children's Home Inc — 0% of income from government
- Carlton Manor Inc — 0% of income from government
- Bay Area Youth Services Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community Partnership for Children Inc?
Find your warmest path to Community Partnership for Children Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.