Skip to content
Community Health Commission of Missouri at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Community Health Commission of Missouri

The COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION OF MISSOURI operates to achieve zero health disparities through community and health system partnerships.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER COALITION$15,000
FORWARD THROUGH FERGUSON$10,000
KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION$2,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Health Center of Boone County

To provide access to primary medical, dental and mental health services for community members, with emphasis on the medically underserved, to improve the health of the community and to train future health care providers.

—
2
South Central Missouri Community Health Center

The mission of four rivers community health center is to provide access to high-quality, compassionate, patient-centered healthcare to everyone regardless of financial, cultural or social barriers.

Health
3
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
4
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
5
Missouri Family Health Council Inc

We exist to ensure that everyone - no matter their income, geography, identity, or circumstances - can access high-quality sexual and reproductive healthcare.

Health
6
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
7
Samuel U Rodgers Health Center Inc

The center's mission is to provide high quality, compassionate and affordable healthcare for all.

Health
8
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
9
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

—
10
Bjc Health System Group Return

The 24 licensed hospitals and service organizations of bjc healthcare serve the healthcare needs of the residents of metropolitan st. louis and kansas city, mid-missouri, eastern kansas and southern illinois. based in urban, suburban, and…

Health
11
Asian Human Services Family Health Center Inc

Ahsfhc is a federally qualified health center. ahsfhc's mission is to provide quality and compassionate health care services to the asian american community and all other underserved or underprivileged communities in a culturally competent…

Health
12
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Care Health Centers; the most unlike its peers is Ho Chou Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS: $224,350 · HealthBETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERSFamily Care Health Centers: $82,880 · HealthFamily Care Health CentersST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK: $75,000 · HealthST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORKCASA DE SALUD: $55,000 · HealthCASA DE SALUD+1 more: $11,370 · HealthAffinia Healthcare: $135,181 · OtherAffinia HealthcareCARESTL HEALTH: $75,000 · OtherCARESTL HEALTHST LOUIS COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER COALITION: $15,000 · OtherST LOUIS COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER…POWER4STL: $8,500 · OtherST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $58,725 · EducationST LOUIS UNIV…HOSCO SHIFT INC: $40,000 · EducationHOSCO SHIFT I…+1 more: $2,500 · EducationHO CHOU FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyDEACONESS FAITH COMMUNITY NURSE MINS INC: $12,610 · ReligionFORWARD THROUGH FERGUSON: $10,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5,000 · Human Services
Health$448,600Other$233,681Education$101,225Philanthropy$15,000Religion$12,610Civil Rights$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS: $224,350 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAffinia Healthcare: $135,181 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFamily Care Health Centers: $82,880 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCARESTL HEALTH: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK: $75,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $58,725 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE SALUD: $55,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHOSCO SHIFT INC: $40,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHO CHOU FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDEACONESS FAITH COMMUNITY NURSE MINS INC: $12,610 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE: $11,370 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPOWER4STL: $8,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…United Way of Greater…Washington UniversityAmerican Heart Associ…St Louis Integrated H…Generate Health StlPershing Charitable T…St Louis Community Fo…American Cancer Socie…Direct ReliefDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
St Louis Community Foundation IncMO25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Washington University · American Heart Association Inc · St Louis Integrated Health Network · Generate Health Stl · Pershing Charitable Trust · St Louis Community Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Direct Relief · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Commission of Missouri funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Commission of Missouri. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Commission of Missouri’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home