· Public charity
Generate Health Stl
The mission of the organization is to build collective power to advocate for racially equitable policies and practices that center, support, and celebrate black families throughout their pregnancy and parenthood journeys.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $109k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VARIOUS CONSULTANTS AND RECB STIPENDS | $140,475 |
| HEARTLAND PMAD CONSULTANTS LLC | $40,975 |
| BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES | $26,020 |
| NURSES FOR NEWBORNS | $13,950 |
| FAMILY FORWARD | $13,950 |
| LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES | $13,950 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $344k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JBJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE2× · 2020–2021 · $203k · revenue +129% · 40% of their budget
- NFNURSES FOR NEWBORNS8× · 2017–2024 · $192k · revenue +23%
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY5× · 2017–2021 · $186k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- SESOLIDARITY ECONOMY STL LLCone grant, 2020 · $64k
- GCGLADIATOR CONSULTINGone grant, 2021 · $50k
- ARAREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue +154%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community Development and Community Center and social services
The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…
Behavioral Health Network is a collaborative effort of providers working together to improve our community by leading behavioral health planning and coordination.
As a faith-based organization, our mission is to create vibrant communities through affordable quality housing where low and moderate income families can thrive, prosper and build wealth.
To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…
We exist to ensure that everyone - no matter their income, geography, identity, or circumstances - can access high-quality sexual and reproductive healthcare.
Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri
To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…
Economic development.
The mission of the organization is to build collective power to advocate for racially equitable policies and practices that center, support, and celebrate black families throughout their pregnancy and parenthood journeys.
Our Mission is to solve homelessness as we know it by establishing a pathway for our unhoused neighbors to a home with dignity.
St. patrick center transforms lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Gift of Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Family Care Health Centers ↗
- Who funds CASA DE SALUD ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds SSM HEALTH CARE ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Affinia Healthcare ↗
- Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS ANTI-RACISM ORGANIZING & TRAINING ↗
- Who funds FORWARD THROUGH FERGUSON ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK ↗
- Who funds RUSTIC ROOTS SANCTUARY CO ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ALIVE AND WELL COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds PARK CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds New Heights Community Resource Center ↗
- Who funds URBAN SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Walk N Faith Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Washington University · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Pott Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Youthbridge Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Generate Health Stl funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.