Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

St Louis Regional Health Commission

The community health commission of missouri operates to achieve zero health disparities through community and health system partnerships.

$799k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$224k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $647k
$49,998
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS$224,350
AFFINIA HEALTHCARE$135,181
FAMILY CARE HEALTH CENTERS$82,880
MYRTLE HILLIARD DAVIS CHC$75,000
ST INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK$75,000
CASA DE SALUD$55,000
STL UNIVERSITY$49,998
HOSCO SHIFT INC$40,000
HO-CHOU FAMILY FOUNDATION$15,000
DEACONESS NURSE MINISTRY$12,610
IFM COMMUNITY MEDICINE$11,370
ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY - SPONSORED PROGRAMS$8,727
POWER4STL$8,500
SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER$5,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
2
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
3
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
4
Greater Sioux Community Health Center Inc

The mission of promise community health center is to provide accessible, holistic health care that adapts to the needs of the community to improve the wellbeing of all persons.

Health
5
Family Health Center of Boone County

To provide access to primary medical, dental and mental health services for community members, with emphasis on the medically underserved, to improve the health of the community and to train future health care providers.

6
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
7
Swope Health Services

Swope health services (swope health) improves the health and wellness of the community by delivering accessible, quality, comprehensive patient care.

Health
8
St Elizabeth's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Fr ancis

The mission of st. elizabeth's hospital is to reveal and embody christ's healing love for all people through our high quality franciscan healthcare ministry.

Health
9
Healthcore Clinic Inc

The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.

Health
10
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
11
Samuel U Rodgers Health Center Inc

The center's mission is to provide high quality, compassionate and affordable healthcare for all.

Health
12
South Central Missouri Community Health Center

The mission of four rivers community health center is to provide access to high-quality, compassionate, patient-centered healthcare to everyone regardless of financial, cultural or social barriers.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Care Health Centers and the most unlike its peers is Ho Chou Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS — $224,350 · HealthBETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERSFamily Care Health Centers — $82,880 · HealthFamily Care Health CentersST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK — $75,000 · HealthST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORKCASA DE SALUD — $55,000 · HealthCASA DE SALUD+1 more — $11,370 · HealthAffinia Healthcare — $135,181 · OtherAffinia HealthcareCARESTL HEALTH — $75,000 · OtherCARESTL HEALTHPOWER4STL — $8,500 · OtherST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $58,725 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVE…HOSCO SHIFT INC — $40,000 · EducationHOSCO SHIFT IN…HO CHOU FAMILY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · PhilanthropyDEACONESS FAITH COMMUNITY NURSE MINS INC — $12,610 · ReligionSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER — $5,000 · Human Services
Health$448,600Other$218,681Education$98,725Philanthropy$15,000Religion$12,610Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS — $224,350 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAffinia Healthcare — $135,181 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFamily Care Health Centers — $82,880 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCARESTL HEALTH — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK — $75,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $58,725 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE SALUD — $55,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHOSCO SHIFT INC — $40,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHO CHOU FAMILY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDEACONESS FAITH COMMUNITY NURSE MINS INC — $12,610 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE — $11,370 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPOWER4STL — $8,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Washington University · American Heart Association Inc · St Louis Integrated Health Network · Generate Health Stl · Pershing Charitable Trust · St Louis Community Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Direct Relief · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Louis Regional Health Commission funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $4k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph