Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

St Louis Integrated Health Network

The st.

$4.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3.2M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Health$4.8M
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
  • $250k+3 grants · $4.2M
$563,624
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AFFINIA HEALTHCARE$3,161,723
BETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS$563,624
CARESTL HEALTH$492,192
FAMILY CARE HEALTH CENTERS$129,631
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 21%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 21%AFFINIA HEALTHCARE: $3.2M → 21%AFFINIA HEALTHCARE: $144k → 21%BETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS: $564k → 21%CARESTL HEALTH: $492k → 21%CARESTL HEALTH: $136k → 21%BETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS: $76k → 21%FAMILY CARE HEALTH CENTERS: $130k → 21%FAMILY CARE HEALTH CENTERS: $53k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
2
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
3
Food Outreach Inc

To provide nutritional support and enhance the quality of life of men, women, and children living with hiv/aids or cancer

Food & Nutrition
4
Family Health Center of Boone County

To provide access to primary medical, dental and mental health services for community members, with emphasis on the medically underserved, to improve the health of the community and to train future health care providers.

5
Owensville Primary Care Inc

Our mission is to provide patient centered medical and behavioral health services to our community. As a nonprofit organization, we provide these services to all persons, including our communitys most vulnerable - regardless of financial…

Health
6
Community Health Center of Central Missouri

To provide improved access to primary care, behavioral healthcare and oral health care services for medically underserved individuals in central missouri regardless of their ability to pay. our vision is embracing people and inspiring…

Human Services
7
Samuel U Rodgers Health Center Inc

The center's mission is to provide high quality, compassionate and affordable healthcare for all.

Health
8
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

9
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
10
Health and Homes St Louis

To improve blighted community areas in st. louis including, but not limited to, west florissant avenue and the surrounding areas in ferguson.

Community Improvement
11
Recovery St Louis
Health
12
Casa De Salud

To facilitate and deliver high quality clinical and mental health services for uninsured and underinsured patients, focusing on new immigrants and refugees who encounter barriers to accessing other sources of care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Care Health Centers and the most unlike its peers is Wesley House Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Affinia Healthcare — $3,305,717 · OtherAffinia HealthcareCARESTL HEALTH — $628,109 · OtherCARESTL HEALTHBETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS — $639,573 · HealthBETTY JEAN KERR PEO…Family Care Health Centers — $182,558 · HealthFamily Care Health …
Other$3,933,826Health$822,131

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAffinia Healthcare — $3,305,717 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetBETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS — $639,573 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCARESTL HEALTH — $628,109 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Care Health Centers — $182,558 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Health Commission of MissouriMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Health Commission of Missouri · American Heart Association Inc · Direct Relief

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Louis Integrated Health Network funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph