· Public charity
Community Health Choice Texas Inc
To improve the health and well-being of all texans, particularly the underserved, by opening doors to healthcare and health-related services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $325,236 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $444,153 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $118,917 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k7 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $94k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $184k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOUSTON PARKS BOARD | $109,710 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER HOUSTON | $74,319 |
| MARCH OF DIMES | $41,053 |
| THE IMMUNIZATION PARTNERSHIP | $16,279 |
| FIT HOUSTON INC | $14,156 |
| GENESYS WORKS HOUSTON | $12,331 |
| ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICA | $10,617 |
| CRISTO REY WORK STUDY PROGRAM INC | $7,701 |
| Harris County Hospital District | $7,078 |
| HCHD FOUNDATION | $7,078 |
| ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY AFFILIATED PLANS | $7,078 |
| PROUNITAS INC | $7,078 |
| MY CONNECT COMMUNITY | $5,662 |
| CRAIN COMMUNICATIONS-MODERN HEALTHCARE | $5,096 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HPHouston Parks Board2× · 2020–2022 · $260k · revenue +54%
- BABoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc2× · 2020–2022 · $174k · revenue +20%
- PIPROUNITAS INC3× · 2018–2022 · $32k · revenue +122%
Funded once
- SFSan Francisco Nativity Academygraduatedone grant, 2018 · $252k · revenue +154%
CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $23k · revenue +39%- ESEASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $21k · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.
The mission of the Houston Area Parkinson Society is to use a whole-human approach to community building, which reduces the fear and isolation associated with a Parkinson's diagnosis.
Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.
The mission of Collaborative for Children is to meaningfully improve the quality of early childhood education and care for Greater Houston's children through those most influential in their lives.
To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.
The organization provides medical services in the form of primary and preventive care to underserved and underinsured residents of harris county.
The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…
Rebuilding Together Houston is the only organization in Houston and Harris County providing free home repairs to hundreds of families each year. We employ licensed contractors to restore homes to safe, livable conditions, extending each…
The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.
Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…
Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.
See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Association for the Advancement of Mexican Americans and the most unlike its peers is Noahs House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Houston Parks Board ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Nativity Academy ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds Harris County Hospital District Foundation ↗
- Who funds PROUNITAS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE IMMUNIZATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Making It Better dba Literacy Now ↗
- Who funds The Arc of Harris County ↗
- Who funds Fit Houston Inc ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC HEALTH COALITION ↗
- Who funds AIDS FOUNDATION HOUSTON INC ↗
- Who funds My Connect Community ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE OF COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST3YEARS ↗
- Who funds Noahs House ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL ADVERTISERS INC ↗
- Who funds Cristo Rey Work Study Program Inc ↗
- Who funds Center for Public Policy Priorities ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY AFFILIATED PLANS ↗
- Who funds Children At Risk ↗
- Who funds CULTURE OF HEALTH - ADVANCING TOGETHER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Episcopal Health Foundation · Texas Children's Hospital · Baxter Trust Co Private Foundation Services · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Rockwell Fund Inc · The Junior League of Houston Inc · The Methodist Hospital · The William Stamps Farish Fund · The Powell Foundation · Strake Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Health Choice Texas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.