Skip to content
Community Congregational Dev Corp at a glance

· Private foundation

Community Congregational Dev Corp

Provide rental housing and related facilities including financing, programs, and services specially designed to meet the physical, social, psychological, and spiritual needs of the aged.

$1.1M
Granted FY2026still arriving
1
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.0MPublic Benefit$1.6MReligion$1.6MHuman Services$1.4MCivil Rights$271kCrime & Legal$160kHealth$138kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kOther$0
02FY2026 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF CHULA VISTA$1,100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Chicano Federation: $200k → 11%Casa Familiar: $71k → 11%Casa Familiar: $1k → 11%Neighborhood House Association: $64k → 11%Project 11: $16k → 11%Operation Promise Community Service: $15k → 11%Serving Seniors: $386k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $200k → 11%Serving Seniors: $70k → 11%MAAC Project: $28k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.2M · 10 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +154% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$7.2M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+154%
+23%

Still filing today

30%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RL
    RENEWING LIFE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +338% · 92% of their budget
  • SS
    SERVING SENIORS
    3× · 2021–2025 · $656k · revenue +14%
  • CASA FAMILIAR INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $72k · revenue +154%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CONTREGATIONAL CHURCH OF
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • CF
    CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -11%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $160k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities Diocese of San Diego

Catholic Charities provides social services and administers various governmental and social programs. Designed to meet the challenge of the ever-changing community by utilizing spiritual, human and financial resources, our programs enable…

Human Services
2
Urban Angels Co Scott Lutwak

Urban angels is designed to nourish and provide food for the homeless and hungry of san dieo, ca. urban angels provides feeding services every wednesday in collboration with the salvation army and is the primary food provider for residents…

—
3
New Door Opportunities

Feeding the homeless population in san d

Food & Nutrition
4
Care for the Children

Our mission is to provide homebound older adults with low income with nutritious food box delivery. Additionally, our food distribution program provides food to all in the communities we serve who need a helping hand. Our programs aim to…

—
5
Senior Advocates of the Desert

Social Work Advocacy on behalf of low-income seniors in the Coachella Valley.

Human Services
6
La Familia Senior Community Center
—
7
Alpha Project for the Homeless

Alpha Project for the Homeless (Alpha Project) was organized in February 1987 under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The mission of Alpha Project is to empower individuals, families, and…

—
8
San Diego Catholic Worker Inc

To assist the needy in San Diego CA

—
9
Senior Gleaners of San Diego County

We feed the hungry by gathering surplus crops and unsold groceries for food distributors across San Diego County.

Food & Nutrition
10
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
11
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
12
Coastal Roots Farm

Coastal roots farm cultivates healthy, connected communities by integrating sustainable agriculture, food justice, and ancient jewish wisdom.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Renewing Life; the most unlike its peers is Safe Space Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF CHULA VISTA: $2,550,000 · OtherCITY OF CHULA VISTARENEWING LIFE: $1,598,063 · OtherRENEWING LIFECOMMUNITY CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $1,010,986 · OtherCOMMUNITY CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHSt Paul's Senior Services: $529,558 · OtherSt Paul's Senior ServicesCOMMUNITY CONTREGATIONAL CHURCH OF: $500,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CONTREGATIONAL CHURCH OFIndividual grant recipient: $374,920 · OtherChula Vista Community Congr: $310,000 · Other+12 more: $449,345 · Other+12 moreSERVING SENIORS: $655,625 · Human ServicesSERVING SENIOR…CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO: $200,000 · Human ServicesCHICANO FEDERA…CASA FAMILIAR INC: $72,398 · Human ServicesCASA FAMILIAR …NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN: $64,050 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD H…+3 more: $58,887 · Human Services+3 moreSafe Space Foundation: $71,300 · Education
Other$7,322,872Human Services$1,050,960Education$71,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRENEWING LIFE: $1,598,063 over 7y, 92% of budgetSERVING SENIORS: $655,625 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO: $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCASA FAMILIAR INC: $72,398 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSafe Space Foundation: $71,300 over 2y, 100% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN: $64,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan Area Advisory Committee on Anti-Poverty of San Diego County Inc: $27,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT 11: $15,987 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetOPERATION PROMISE COMMUNITY SERVICE: $15,000 over 1y, 33% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RENEWING LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SERVING SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds CASA FAMILIAR INC ↗
  • Who funds Safe Space Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee on Anti-Poverty of San Diego County Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT 11 ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION PROMISE COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego Foundat…Price Philanthropies …Alliance Healthcare F…Jacobs & Cushman San …The Parker FoundationTickets for Kids Foun…Jewish Community Foun…Sempra FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The San Diego FoundationCA18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank · The Parker Foundation · Tickets for Kids Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Sempra Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Congregational Dev Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Congregational Dev Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Congregational Dev Corp?

    Find your warmest path to Community Congregational Dev Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Congregational Dev’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home