Skip to content
Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County

We are a catalyst of equitable transformation, aligning partners and resources to implement values-based, data-driven, community-led solutions that help families reach their full potential.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$331k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$1.8MHealth$952kArts & Culture$225kYouth Development$164kEducation$84kPhilanthropy$70kCommunity Improvement$11kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $1,074,919, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,088,615 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,013,696 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $629k
  • $250k+1 grant · $331k
$56,761
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF SONOMA COUNTY$331,039
ALIADOS HEALTH$156,217
CHILD PARENT INSTITUTE$115,146
RAIZES COLLECTIVE$70,024
UNITED WAY OF THE WINE COUNTRY$64,314
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR WELL-BEING$58,319
LA LUZ CENTER$56,803
THE BOTANICAL BUS$56,761
HUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICES$51,520
HANNA BOYS CENTER$41,973
LA FAMILIA SANA$29,805
COMMUNITY SUPPORT NETWORK - CSN$16,555
PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER$10,000
FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER SONOMA COUNTY FOUNDATION$10,000
SONOMA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION$6,443
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF SONOMA COUNTY: $331k → 9%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $6k → 8%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF SONOMA COUNTY: $207k → 9%HUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICES: $71k → 9%HUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICES: $52k → 9%HUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICES: $47k → 9%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF SONOMA COUNTY: $9k → 9%DISABILITY SERVICES & LEGAL CENTER: $6k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $191k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $61k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $57k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $52k → 9%CORAZON RESOURCE CENTER: $315k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $31k → 9%CORAZON RESOURCE CENTER: $151k → 9%CHILD PARENT INSTITUTE: $115k → 9%CHILD PARENT INSTITUTE: $29k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 14 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$3.3M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+11%

Still filing today

86%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Community Child Care Council of Sonoma County
    3× · 2023–2025 · $548k · revenue +63%
  • AH
    ALIADOS HEALTH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $443k · revenue +29%
  • RC
    Raizes Collective
    4× · 2022–2025 · $208k · revenue +371%

Funded once

  • IM
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICAL CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -54%
  • CF
    Center for Volunteer & Nonprofit Leadership
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +25%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INDIAN MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
2
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
3
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
4
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
5
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
6
On the Move

Building and maintaining effective leaders and highly functioning organizations in the public sector.

Human Services
7
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
8
ExpresArte Cultural Wellness Collective

ExpresArte Cultural Wellness Collective is dedicated to centering the voices of people of color, co-creating programs and experiences that infuse healing and hope into our organizing and advocacy spaces. We address the root causes of…

Health
9
Centro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno

Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.

International
10
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
11
Candela Group

The mission of the Candela Group is to bring stability and an improved quality of life to our clients and their loved ones affected by mental illness by uniting them with public and private mental health services Our lived experience as…

Health
12
Latino Commission On Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services

The Latino Commission provides a multitude of services throughout the counties of San Francisco, San Mateo, and Tulare. The Organization currently employs twelve programs eight for adults, and four for youth and transitional age youth…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latino Service Providers; the most unlike its peers is Disability Services & Legal Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
12/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Child Care Council of Sonoma County: $547,794 · Human ServicesCommunity Child Care Council of Sonoma CountySCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $466,304 · Human ServicesSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURGLA LUZ CENTER: $392,247 · Human ServicesLA LUZ CENTERCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $234,510 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSAHUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICES: $169,916 · Human ServicesHUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICESCalifornia Parenting Institute: $144,149 · Human ServicesCalifornia Parenting Institute+2 more: $21,334 · Human ServicesALIADOS HEALTH: $442,961 · HealthALIADOS HEALTHNorthern California Center For Well-Being: $192,835 · HealthNorthern California C…HANNA BOYS CENTER: $163,795 · OtherHANNA BOYS …Sonoma Valley Unified School: $83,569 · OtherSonoma Vall…LA FAMILIA SANA: $29,805 · OtherLA FAMILIA …Community Support Network: $16,555 · Other+7 more: $39,669 · Other+7 moreRaizes Collective: $208,332 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $11,334 · Arts & CultureBOTANICAL BUS: $124,261 · EducationUNITED WAY OF THE WINE COUNTRY: $69,981 · PhilanthropyFAMILY JUSTICE CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$1,976,254Health$635,796Other$333,393Arts & Culture$219,666Education$124,261Philanthropy$69,981Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Child Care Council of Sonoma County: $547,794 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $466,304 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH: $442,961 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetLA LUZ CENTER: $392,247 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $234,510 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRaizes Collective: $208,332 over 4y, 12% of budgetNorthern California Center For Well-Being: $192,835 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetHUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICES: $169,916 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCalifornia Parenting Institute: $144,149 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBOTANICAL BUS: $124,261 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE WINE COUNTRY: $69,981 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetLA FAMILIA SANA: $29,805 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCommunity Support Network: $16,555 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $15,667 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY JUSTICE CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetINTEGRATIVE MEDICAL CLINIC FOUNDATION: $5,667 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCenter for Volunteer & Nonprofit Leadership: $5,667 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA INDIAN MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER: $5,667 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $5,667 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFarm to Pantry: $5,667 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNUESTRA COMUNIDAD: $5,667 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDisability Services & Legal Center: $5,667 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBilingual Broadcasting Foundation Inc: $5,667 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLATINO SERVICE PROVIDERS: $5,667 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Communi…Sonoma County Vintner…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Healthcare Foundation…McNabb FoundationRedwood Credit Union …United Way of the Win…Peter E Haas Jr Famil…East Bay Community Fo…Bothin FoundationMarin Community Found…Sisters of St Joseph …
Sonoma County Community FoundationCA52.4× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Healthcare Foundation Northern Sonoma County · McNabb Foundation · Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc · United Way of the Wine Country · Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund · East Bay Community Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home