Loading…
Loading…
Colorado · Nonprofit
PIKES PEAK REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION (Colorado) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $11,301,391 in grants to it, the largest being PIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($10,524,922). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
PIKES PEAK REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,442 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,442 housing & shelter nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
51% of PIKES PEAK REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (39% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $701k → $766k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 93% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of PIKES PEAK REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
PIKES PEAK REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 93% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 71% · 2022 75% · 2023 100% · 2024 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
PIKES PEAK REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Colorado funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
65% of spending goes to programs.
81%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing