Skip to content

· Private foundation

Colorado Hope Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$23kHuman Services$15kEducation$10kYouth Development$8kArts & Culture$8kFood & Nutrition$5kPublic Benefit$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
12
States reached
$266k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Nourish Meals on Wheels$2,000
Denver Rescue Mission$1,500
East West Ministries$1,500
University of Nations Kona$1,500
The Wounded Blue$500
Lord of Hosts Church$500
Article III Project$500
Turning Point USA$500
ACLJ$500
Andrew Wommack Ministries$500
Immigration Accountability Project$500
American Red Cross Donation Center$500
Marilyn Hickey Ministries$500
The Navigators$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Boys Town: $250 → 12%Boys Town: $250 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%Boys Town: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
OR
NV
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 27 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
13

Total granted

$77k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+1349%

Still filing today

37%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesCivil RightsHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +61%
  • NM
    NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    Colorado Christian University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue ×45
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
5
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
6
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
8
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
9
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Diego Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINRS CIRCLE: $8,000 · OtherWINRS CIRCLEWinners Circle: $7,000 · OtherWinners CircleBilly Graham Evang Association: $6,000 · OtherBilly Graham Evang AssociationMARILYN HICKEY MINISTRIES: $5,500 · OtherMARILYN HICKEY MINISTRIESAMERICAN RED CROSS DONATION CENTER: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,250 · OtherDaystar: $2,000 · Other+27 more: $14,800 · Other+27 moreEast-West Ministries International: $7,500 · ReligionEast-West Minist…Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc: $4,500 · ReligionAndrew Wommack M…+1 more: $250 · ReligionUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $7,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …Colorado Christian University: $2,500 · EducationColorado Chris…COLORADO UPLIFT INC: $1,250 · EducationCOLORADO UPLIF…DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,000 · Human ServicesNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $4,500 · Food & NutritionFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC: $550 · Civil RightsARTICLE III INC: $500 · Civil RightsVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$50,550Religion$12,250Education$11,250Human Services$6,000Food & Nutrition$4,500Civil Rights$1,050Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Christian University: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC ↗
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Christian University ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTICLE III INC ↗
  • Who funds The Wounded Blue ↗
  • Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Colorado Hope Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Colorado Hope Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Colorado Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph