Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Colorado Hope Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Religion$23kHuman Services$15kEducation$10kYouth Development$8kArts & Culture$8kFood & Nutrition$5kPublic Benefit$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
12
States reached
$266k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Nourish Meals on Wheels$2,000
East West Ministries$1,500
Denver Rescue Mission$1,500
University of Nations Kona$1,500
Andrew Wommack Ministries$500
Marilyn Hickey Ministries$500
American Red Cross Donation Center$500
The Wounded Blue$500
Immigration Accountability Project$500
Turning Point USA$500
Article III Project$500
ACLJ$500
Lord of Hosts Church$500
Boys Town$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Boys Town: $250 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%Boys Town: $250 → 12%Boys Town: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
OR
NV
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77k · 27 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
13

Total granted

$77k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+1349%

Still filing today

37%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesCivil RightsHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +61%
  • NM
    NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    Colorado Christian University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue ×45

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

5
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
6
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

8
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
9
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

12
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc and the most unlike its peers is San Diego Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Support ServicesChild and Family ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Fallen First Responder Supp…Christian Missionary Organi…Homeless Services & ShelterCommunity Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr21%30%10–20yr17%15%20–35yr12%15%35–55yr13%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr21%25%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr12%26%35–55yr13%30%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
13%
4,367/33,392

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WINRS CIRCLE — $8,000 · OtherWINRS CIRCLEWinners Circle — $7,000 · OtherWinners CircleBilly Graham Evang Association — $6,000 · OtherBilly Graham Evang AssociationMARILYN HICKEY MINISTRIES — $5,500 · OtherMARILYN HICKEY MINISTRIESAMERICAN RED CROSS DONATION CENTER — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC — $2,250 · OtherDaystar — $2,000 · Other+27 more — $14,800 · Other+27 moreEast-West Ministries International — $7,500 · ReligionEast-West Minist…Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc — $4,500 · ReligionAndrew Wommack M…+1 more — $250 · ReligionUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC — $7,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …Colorado Christian University — $2,500 · EducationColorado Chris…COLORADO UPLIFT INC — $1,250 · EducationCOLORADO UPLIF…DENVER RESCUE MISSION — $5,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,000 · Human ServicesNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS — $4,500 · Food & NutritionFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC — $550 · Civil RightsARTICLE III INC — $500 · Civil RightsVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$50,550Religion$12,250Education$11,250Human Services$6,000Food & Nutrition$4,500Civil Rights$1,050Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC — $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS — $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Christian University — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC — $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC — $425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc
  • Who funds NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds Colorado Christian University
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC
  • Who funds FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC
  • Who funds The Wounded Blue
  • Who funds ARTICLE III INC
  • Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC
  • Who funds ELIJAH LIST MINISTRIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Colorado Hope Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph