Skip to content
Colorado Community Health Network Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Colorado Community Health Network Inc

To increase access to high quality health care for people in need in colorado.

$102k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.7MHousing & Shelter$14kEducation$9k
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $90,551, the rows itemized in this filing. The $101,947 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,396 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k12 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$6,748
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHERIDAN HEALTH SERVICES$13,348
PRIMEHEALTH$7,253
COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$6,748
RIVER VALLEY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$6,748
CLINICA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES$6,748
PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$6,748
SALUD FAMILY HEALTH$6,748
TEPEYAC COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$6,455
INNER CITY HEALTH$5,955
PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$5,950
ELEVATED COMMUNITY HEALTH$5,950
NORTHWEST COLORADO HEALTH$5,950
STRIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$5,950
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $8k → 12%COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $7k → 12%COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 20 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$1.6M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+29%

Still filing today

90%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VH
    VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $201k · revenue +79%
  • LC
    LA CLINICA TEPEYAC
    8× · 2017–2026 · $175k · revenue +286%
  • MC
    METRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC
    7× · 2017–2026 · $172k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • HC
    HEALTHY COLORADO
    one grant, 2017 · $136k
  • SH
    SHERIDAN HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • NI
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANT ADVANCEMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
3
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
4
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
5
First Choice Community Healthcare Inc

To improve the health, life skills, and well-being of all members of the communities we serve by providing primary medical, dental, and behavioral health care, including health education, to the residents of bernalillo, valencia, and santa…

Health
6
Challis Area Health Center Inc

We provide quality healthcare to our community.

—
7
Central Texas Community Health Centers

Communitycare operates 25 health center locations offering comprehensive primary care services for the entire family including pediatrics, behavioral health services, and dental care.

Health
8
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
9
Community Health Center of Central Wyoming Inc

To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay. it is the desire of chccw to treat all patients with the dignity and respect they deserve…

Health
10
Vvmc Diversified Services

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

Health
11
Lakeshore Community Health Care Inc

Lakeshore community health care provides access to comprehensive, integrated health care, regardless of ability to pay, eliminating health disparities among the underserved.

Health
12
Western Colorado Healthcare Alliance

To help rural providers with collaborative solutions and resources focusing on rural healthcare.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clinica Campesina Family Health Services; the most unlike its peers is Marillac Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $200,719 · HealthVALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INCLA CLINICA TEPEYAC: $175,381 · HealthLA CLINICA TEPEYACMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC: $172,265 · HealthMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INCSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC: $134,380 · HealthSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INCMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $128,319 · HealthMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERSSALUD FAMILY HEALTH: $112,801 · HealthSALUD FAMILY HEALTHCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES: $106,784 · HealthCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICESHIGH PLAINS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $68,668 · HealthNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $59,663 · HealthSUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $58,604 · Health+9 more: $199,435 · Health+9 moreHEALTHY COLORADO: $135,809 · OtherHEALTHY COLORADODenver Health and Hospital Authority: $71,550 · OtherDenver Health and Hos…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $61,148 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVER…DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $60,980 · OtherDENVER HEALTH AND HOS…+2 more: $17,716 · OtherColorado Coalition for the Homeless: $20,971 · Human ServicesNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANT ADVANCEMENT INC: $9,107 · Education
Health$1,417,019Other$347,203Human Services$20,971Education$9,107

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $200,719 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLA CLINICA TEPEYAC: $175,381 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC: $172,265 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC: $134,380 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $128,319 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSALUD FAMILY HEALTH: $112,801 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES: $106,784 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH PLAINS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $68,668 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $60,980 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $59,663 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $58,604 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $47,141 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNCOMPAHGRE COMBINED CLINICS: $46,094 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetOLATHE COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $35,797 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Coalition for the Homeless: $20,971 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARILLAC CLINIC INC: $14,253 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $12,605 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANT ADVANCEMENT INC: $9,107 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLINICA COLORADO: $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,345 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOCTORS CARE: $5,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental Plan of …Caring for Colorado C…Caring for Colorado F…The Colorado Health F…Direct ReliefColorado Gives Founda…Mile High United Way …Community Health Prov…The Denver FoundationEl Pomar FoundationAmerican Cancer Socie…Rose Community Founda…
Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation IncCO41× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Direct Relief · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Community Health Provider Alliance · The Denver Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Rose Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Colorado Community Health Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Colorado Community Health Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • National Association of Community Health Centers Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Colorado Community Health Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home