· Public charity
Community Health Provider Alliance
Our mission is to provide cost-effective, high-quality integrated primary care and preventative services to colorado's low-income working families and individuals.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $28,329 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $63,344 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,015 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SER | $20,541 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF COLORADO | $7,788 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES4× · 2020–2024 · $64k · revenue +152%
- SCSOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC2× · 2022–2023 · $47k · revenue +44%
- VHVALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC3× · 2020–2022 · $36k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- PVPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERSone grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +4%
- SCSUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTHone grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +23%
- NCNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +146%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide primary health care to those in need by offering top quality care through accessibility, leadership, and financial independence.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.
Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
We provide quality healthcare to our community.
Mountain park health center works with the communities it serves to sustain and improve health by providing affordable primary care to those who need it most. our commitment to the community is to keep healthcare affordable and accessible.
To help rural providers with collaborative solutions and resources focusing on rural healthcare.
Elevating health across our mountain communities.
La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.
To provide equitable primary health care and resources to those with limited access across colorado, especially to those who are uninsured.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clinica Campesina Family Health Services and the most unlike its peers is Metro Community Provider Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds METRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds MARILLAC CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA TEPEYAC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Community Health Network Inc · Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · The Colorado Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Direct Relief · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Nextfifty Initiative
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Health Provider Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.