Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Colorado Community Health Network Inc

To increase access to high quality health care for people in need in colorado.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$1.7MHousing & Shelter$14kEducation$9k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $81,075 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $84,425 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,350 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVER VALLEY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$7,775
SALUD FAMILY HEALTH$7,650
MARILLAC CLINIC INC$7,000
NORTHWEST COLORADO HEALTH$6,800
ELEVATED COMMUNITY HEALTH$6,800
TEPEYAC COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$6,700
INNER CITY HEALTH$6,650
HIGH PLAINS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$6,650
PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$6,350
VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC$6,350
STRIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$6,350
UNCOMPAGHRE MEDICAL CENTER$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $8k → 12%COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 18 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+29%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VH
    VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $201k · revenue +79%
  • LC
    LA CLINICA TEPEYAC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $169k · revenue +286%
  • MC
    METRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $166k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • HC
    HEALTHY COLORADO
    one grant, 2017 · $136k
  • SH
    SHERIDAN HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • NI
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANT ADVANCEMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
3
Pueblo Community Health Center Inc

To provide primary health care to those in need by offering top quality care through accessibility, leadership, and financial independence.

—
4
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
5
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
6
Challis Area Health Center Inc

We provide quality healthcare to our community.

—
7
Western Colorado Healthcare Alliance

To help rural providers with collaborative solutions and resources focusing on rural healthcare.

Education
8
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
9
First Choice Community Healthcare Inc

To improve the health, life skills, and well-being of all members of the communities we serve by providing primary medical, dental, and behavioral health care, including health education, to the residents of bernalillo, valencia, and santa…

Health
10
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
11
Community Clinic Inc

Empower patients to partner with staff for an unparalleled healthcare experience through integrated primary care services teams in a learning environment. we deliver high quality, affordable care to every patient during all stages of life.

Health
12
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clinica Campesina Family Health Services and the most unlike its peers is National Institute for Medical Assistant Advancement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr12%50%35–55yr14%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr12%61%35–55yr14%7%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
13%
2,931/22,917

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $200,719 · HealthVALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INCLA CLINICA TEPEYAC — $168,926 · HealthLA CLINICA TEPEYACMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC — $166,315 · HealthMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INCSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC — $128,430 · HealthSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INCMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS — $128,319 · HealthMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERSSALUD FAMILY HEALTH — $106,053 · HealthSALUD FAMILY HEALTHCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES — $100,036 · HealthCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICESHIGH PLAINS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $68,668 · HealthSUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH — $58,604 · HealthNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $53,713 · HealthUNCOMPAHGRE COMBINED CLINICS — $46,094 · Health+8 more — $127,435 · Health+8 moreHEALTHY COLORADO — $135,809 · OtherHEALTHY COLORADODenver Health and Hospital Authority — $71,550 · OtherDenver Health and Hos…DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $60,980 · OtherDENVER HEALTH AND HOS…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $47,800 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVER…SHERIDAN HEALTH SERVICES INC — $10,968 · OtherColorado Coalition for the Homeless — $14,223 · Human ServicesNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANT ADVANCEMENT INC — $9,107 · Education
Health$1,353,312Other$327,107Human Services$14,223Education$9,107

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVALLEY-WIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $200,719 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLA CLINICA TEPEYAC — $168,926 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC — $166,315 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC — $128,430 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS — $128,319 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSALUD FAMILY HEALTH — $106,053 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES — $100,036 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH PLAINS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $68,668 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $60,980 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH — $58,604 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $53,713 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNCOMPAHGRE COMBINED CLINICS — $46,094 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $41,191 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLATHE COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $29,049 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Coalition for the Homeless — $14,223 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANT ADVANCEMENT INC — $9,107 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINNER CITY HEALTH CENTER — $6,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLINICA COLORADO — $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $5,345 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOCTORS CARE — $5,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental Plan of …Caring for Colorado C…Caring for Colorado F…The Colorado Health F…Direct ReliefColorado Gives Founda…Mile High United Way …Community Health Prov…The Denver FoundationEl Pomar FoundationAmerican Cancer Socie…Rose Community Founda…
Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation IncCO41× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Direct Relief · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Community Health Provider Alliance · The Denver Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Rose Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Colorado Community Health Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • National Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home