Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of homelessness throughout colorado.

$16M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$505k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Housing & Shelter$27MHuman Services$648kHealth$224kCrime & Legal$179kEmployment$127kPublic Benefit$18k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $2,590,336 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $16,393,777 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $13,803,441 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$122,511
Median grant
1
States reached
$203M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$504,804
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$289,851
THE DELORES PROJECT$261,039
URBAN PEAK$235,484
Colorado Department of Local Affairs$175,573
Posada$161,109
LOAVES & FISHES MINISTRIES FREMONT COUNTY$156,819
THE GATHERING PLACE$135,750
BRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY$122,511
Catholic Charities Western Slope$119,957
Spark Community Foundation$112,101
Housing Solutions of the Southwest$92,744
SHARE Inc$66,850
Family Tree$61,946
HELP for Abused Partners$59,118
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Family Tree: $366k → 7%INTEGRATED FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 8%LOW INCOME FAMILY EMPOWERMENT: $59k → 10%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $61k → 11%Catholic Charities Western Slope: $391k → 12%HELP for Abused Partners: $99k → 15%Loaves & Fishes Ministries Fremont County: $333k → 17%Advocates Against Domestic Assault: $79k → 18%FAMILY TREE: $303k → 7%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $44k → 11%Catholic Charities Western Slope: $148k → 12%HELP for Abused Partners: $70k → 15%Loaves & Fishes Ministries Fremont County: $163k → 17%ADVOCATES AGAINST DOMESTIC ASSAULT: $52k → 18%FAMILY TREE: $210k → 7%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $40k → 11%Catholic Charities Western Slope: $146k → 12%HELP for Abused Partners: $67k → 15%LOAVES & FISHES MINISTRIES FREMONT COUNTY: $160k → 17%ADVOCATES AGAINST DOMESTIC ASSAULT: $47k → 18%Family Tree: $189k → 7%Catholic Charities Western Slope: $120k → 12%HELP FOR ABUSED PARTNERS: $64k → 15%LOAVES & FISHES MINISTRIES FREMONT COUNTY: $157k → 17%ADVOCATES AGAINST DOMESTIC ASSAULT: $46k → 18%FAMILY TREE: $180k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WESTERN SLOPE: $106k → 12%HELP FOR ABUSED PARTNERS: $61k → 15%LOAVES & FISHES MINISTRIES FREMONT COUNTY: $156k → 17%ADVOCATES AGAINST DOMESTIC ASSAULT: $42k → 18%Family Tree: $164k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WESTERN SLOPE: $101k → 12%HELP for Abused Partners: $59k → 15%Loaves & Fishes Ministries Fremont County: $152k → 17%Advocates Against Domestic Assault: $38k → 18%Family Tree: $98k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WESTERN SLOPE: $99k → 12%HELP FOR ABUSED PARTNERS: $56k → 15%LOAVES & FISHES MINISTRIES FREMONT COUNTY: $145k → 17%Family Tree: $62k → 7%Catholic Charities Western Slope: $93k → 12%HELP for Abused Partners: $55k → 15%LOAVES & FISHES MINISTRIES FREMONT COUNTY: $145k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $84k → 12%Capital Hill Action and Recreation Group: $97k → 12%Capitol Hill Action and Recreation Group: $88k → 12%Capital Hill Action and Recreation Group: $80k → 12%Capital Hill Action and Recreation Group: $72k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$27M · 31 repeat orgs$561k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
5

Total granted

$27M
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+28%

Still filing today

87%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $306k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthPublic BenefitEmploymentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UP
    URBAN PEAK DENVER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +239%
  • HS
    HOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTHWEST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +160% · 35% of their budget
  • TS
    THE ST FRANCIS CENTER
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • National Coalition for the Homelessgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +402% · 31% of their budget
  • HH
    HILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $61k · revenue +28%
  • LI
    Low Income Family Empowerment Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $59k · revenue -72%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
2
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
3
Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence Inc

To provide safe shelter, support and advocacy for adults and their children, and to provide an end to violence against adults, youth and children through support, advocacy and community organizing.

Human Services
4
Colorado Homeless Families Inc

CHF assists working families in their quest to go from homelessness to self-sufficiency for life.

Housing & Shelter
5
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
6
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
7
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
8
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
9
Sunshine Home Share Colorado

Sunshine home share colorado ensures quality of life for older adults and strengthens communities through a safe home-sharing model, supportive economic empowerment, and connections to resources and services.

Housing & Shelter
10
Julia Greeley Home Inc

Julia greeley home, inc. serves single unaccompanied women in the denver metro area between the ages of 18 and 64 who are struggling with chronic or repeated homelessness. the program fulfills existing gaps between overnight short term…

Housing & Shelter
11
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
12
Domestic Violence Intervention Services

See schedule oadvancing physical and emotional safety by reducing the impact and occurrence of sexual and domestic violence, human trafficking and stalking through inclusive intervention and prevention services for children, youth, and…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Gathering Place a Refuge for Rebuilding Lives and the most unlike its peers is Aurora Housing Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr13%56%35–55yr15%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr17%13%20–35yr13%54%35–55yr15%19%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
13%
4,060/31,231

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
28/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $3,674,364 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE ST FRANCIS CENTER — $1,817,977 · OtherTHE ST FRANCIS CENTERVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA COLORADO BRANCH — $1,783,058 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA COLORADO BRANCHBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY — $1,337,813 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTYAURORA HOUSING AUTHORITY — $1,173,030 · OtherAURORA HOUSING AUTHORITYGREELEY TRANSITIONAL HOUSE DBA GREELEY FAMILY HOUSE — $683,791 · OtherGREELEY TRANSITIONAL HOUSE DBA GREELEY FAMILY HO…LA PUENTE HOME INC — $666,838 · OtherLA PUENTE HOME INCSHARE Inc — $510,233 · Other+5 more — $445,319 · OtherURBAN PEAK DENVER — $2,790,654 · Housing & ShelterURBAN PEAK DENVERHOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTHWEST — $2,091,845 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTHWESTPOSADA — $1,561,840 · Housing & ShelterPOSADATHE DELORES PROJECT — $1,352,066 · Housing & ShelterTHE DELORES PROJECTTHE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUILDING LIVES — $1,013,727 · Housing & ShelterTHE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUI…AURORA HOUSING CORPORATION — $756,182 · Housing & ShelterAURORA HOUSING CORPORATIONFAMILY TREE INC — $1,572,938 · Human ServicesFAMILY TREE INCLoaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County Inc — $1,410,956 · Human ServicesLoaves and Fishes Minis…CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER — $1,205,187 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES & CO…Help For Abused Partners Inc — $530,202 · Human ServicesHelp For Abused Partner…Advocates Against Domestic Assault — $348,897 · Human ServicesAdvocates Against Domes…HEART OF BOARDWALK — $337,543 · Human ServicesHEART OF BOARDWALK+7 more — $511,745 · Human Services+7 moreMental Health Center of Denver — $97,610 · HealthHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $60,854 · HealthSummitstone Health Partners — $25,522 · HealthSPARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $112,101 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH — $17,834 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $126,627 · EmploymentROSE ANDOM CENTER INC — $39,254 · Crime & Legal
Other$12,092,423Housing & Shelter$9,566,314Human Services$5,917,468Health$183,986Public Benefit$129,935Employment$126,627Crime & Legal$39,254

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetURBAN PEAK DENVER — $2,790,654 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetHOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTHWEST — $2,091,845 over 8y, 35% of budgetTHE ST FRANCIS CENTER — $1,817,977 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC — $1,572,938 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetPOSADA — $1,561,840 over 8y, 18% of budgetLoaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County Inc — $1,410,956 over 8y, 14% of budgetTHE DELORES PROJECT — $1,352,066 over 5y, 15% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY — $1,337,813 over 8y, 14% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER — $1,205,187 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUILDING LIVES — $1,013,727 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetAURORA HOUSING CORPORATION — $756,182 over 2y, 22% of budgetGREELEY TRANSITIONAL HOUSE DBA GREELEY FAMILY HOUSE — $683,791 over 4y, 43% of budgetLA PUENTE HOME INC — $666,838 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetHelp For Abused Partners Inc — $530,202 over 8y, 28% of budgetSHARE Inc — $510,233 over 8y, 19% of budgetAdvocates Against Domestic Assault — $348,897 over 8y, 15% of budgetHEART OF BOARDWALK — $337,543 over 4y, 13% of budgetAlternatives to Violence Inc — $162,324 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $126,627 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $112,101 over 1y, 13% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC — $101,065 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNational Coalition for the Homeless — $100,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetMental Health Center of Denver — $97,610 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $95,875 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetIntegrated Family Community Services — $78,606 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC — $67,267 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $60,854 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLow Income Family Empowerment Inc — $59,285 over 1y, 20% of budgetROSE ANDOM CENTER INC — $39,254 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC — $25,915 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSummitstone Health Partners — $25,522 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Pinon Project — $22,473 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH — $17,834 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTENNIAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $10,005 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds URBAN PEAK DENVER ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds THE ST FRANCIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds POSADA ↗
  • Who funds Loaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE DELORES PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUILDING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GREELEY TRANSITIONAL HOUSE DBA GREELEY FAMILY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LA PUENTE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Help For Abused Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHARE Inc ↗
  • Who funds Advocates Against Domestic Assault ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF BOARDWALK ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives to Violence Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds National Coalition for the Homeless ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health Center of Denver ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds Integrated Family Community Services ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Low Income Family Empowerment Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROSE ANDOM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds Summitstone Health Partners ↗
  • Who funds The Pinon Project ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds CENTENNIAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Colorado Health F…Colorado Gives Founda…El Pomar FoundationAnschutz Family Found…Mile High United Way …The Denver FoundationCaring for Colorado F…Trailhead InstituteThe Women's Foundatio…Temple Hoyne Buell Fo…Daniels FundEnergy Outreach Color…
The Colorado Health FoundationCO43.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Denver Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Trailhead Institute · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Daniels Fund · Energy Outreach Colorado

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Colorado Coalition for the Homeless funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home