Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cole-Crone Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
47
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$3.2MInternational$1.1MEducation$720kPhilanthropy$625kScience & Tech$525kFood & Nutrition$450kPublic Safety & Disaster$385kAnimals$67kOther$0
02FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $525k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $905k
$20,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENDEAVOR HEALTH$180,000
MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$150,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$100,000
RUSH ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP FUND$100,000
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$75,000
GLOBAL GIVING FOUNDATION$50,000
ISEPS GLOBAL OPTHALMOLOGY FOUNDATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$50,000
MIDWEST FOOD BANK$50,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$50,000
ST BERNARD PROJECT$40,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$35,000
LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$35,000
DIRECT RELIEF$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $505k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $75k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 44 repeat orgs$668k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
6

Total granted

$6.4M
$487k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+110%

Still filing today

80%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $181k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $767k · revenue +140%
  • EH
    Endeavor Health Clinical Operations
    2× · 2022–2023 · $380k · revenue +12%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • NS
    NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • I
    IAPF
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
2
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
3
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
6
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
7
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
10
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Human Health Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
29/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUSH ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $500,000 · OtherRUSH ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP FUNDNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $500,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONNORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherNORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM…Individual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $190,000 · OtherAmerican Brain Tumor AssociationLES TURNER ALS FOUNDATION: $145,000 · OtherLES TURNER ALS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $145,000 · OtherGLENWOOD ACADEMY+20 more: $487,805 · Other+20 moreMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $766,887 · HealthMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUND…Endeavor Health Clinical Operations: $380,000 · HealthEndeavor Health Clinical Operati…LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $180,000 · HealthLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONEndeavor Health: $180,000 · HealthEndeavor HealthHuman Health Project: $125,000 · HealthHuman Health ProjectPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $120,000 · HealthPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation…AMERICAN HEADACHE ASSOCIATION: $115,000 · HealthHealthwell Foundation: $110,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $75,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Health+1 more: $55,000 · HealthAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $475,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TE…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $250,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERE…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION…DIRECT RELIEF: $155,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $150,000 · InternationalREMOTE AREA MEDICALPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $110,000 · InternationalPATHFINDER INTERNATIONA…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAG…+4 more: $155,000 · International+4 moreMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $200,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $195,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Human ServicesInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $30,000 · Human ServicesISEPS GLOBAL OPHTHALMOLOGY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $125,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $250,000 · Food & NutritionTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $190,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$2,467,805Health$2,181,887International$1,595,000Human Services$505,000Philanthropy$375,000Food & Nutrition$250,000Public Safety & Disaster$190,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $766,887 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $475,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $380,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetISEPS GLOBAL OPHTHALMOLOGY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $195,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $190,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $190,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetEndeavor Health: $180,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $155,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $150,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $145,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHuman Health Project: $125,000 over 5y, 85% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $120,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN HEADACHE ASSOCIATION: $115,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHealthwell Foundation: $110,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL LINKS: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHadassah The Women's Zionist Org of America Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOAST GUARD AUXILIARY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ISEPS GLOBAL OPHTHALMOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
  • Who funds LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Human Health Project ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN HEADACHE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Healthwell Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL LINKS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cole-Crone Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cole-Crone Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cole-Crone Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph